Skip to main content

A Federal Court judge says he doesn’t have the power to reconsider how much the government should pay lawyers who led a successful class-action lawsuit against Canada over the so-called ’60s Scoop.

In a decision released this week, Judge Michael Phelan said the fees were approved by another Federal Court judge in May and there has been no appeal or legal process to reopen the matter.

He further notes that the appeal periods have expired and the parties involved the class-action have been working to carry out the $750-million compensation deal for victims of the Scoop, Indigenous children who lost their cultural heritage after being taken from their homes and placed with non-Indigenous families.

Story continues below advertisement

“It is not in the interests of the claimants or the administration of justice to add further uncertainty by reopening the issue of council fees further,” Phelan wrote in his decision.

The judge said lawyers in the federal suit are free to reassess their fees and decide whether part of the money should instead go to the settlement, but are legally entitled to the sum approved by Federal Court Judge Michel Shore, who was handling the matter.

Phelan had requested input into whether he could review the fees after Justice Edward Belobaba, in a separate but parallel proceeding in Ontario Superior Court, found the $75 million Canada had agreed to pay in legal costs was excessive.

Belobaba also took issue with part of the deal that split the fees evenly between lawyers who acted in Federal Court and those who did in Superior Court.

The lawyers who had spent years fighting the landmark case in Superior Court agreed to allow Belobaba to deal with the fee issue separately, so that he could approve the Scoop settlement under which survivors are to be paid up to $50,000 each.

The lawyers in the Federal Court action, however, maintained that Shore had signed off on the settlement on May 11, including the fee arrangement. But they returned to Federal Court for one more approval in light of the decision on the Ontario end.

Phelan, who took over the case from Shore, signed an order last month confirming the lawyers in Federal Court would get their $37.5 million. But he sent a note to the federal parties the next day saying his approval applied to the agreement except for the fees and later questioned if he could even rule on the issue.

Story continues below advertisement

In the end, the judge found that Belobaba’s ruling did not raise a circumstance that would permit the reopening of a federal judgment, saying each court’s decisions stand on their own.

It would also be inappropriate for the Federal Court to comment on the merits of the Superior Court ruling, given that counsel fees remain a “live issue” before the Superior Court, Phelan said.

“It is not surprising that different court records yield different court decisions,” Phelan wrote. “Both are valid and subsisting decisions.”

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter