Skip to main content

Canada Forces needs more info on perpetrators of sexual misconduct, centre says

More information is needed about perpetrators of sexual assaults and other sexual misconduct in the military if the Canadian Armed Forces wants to eliminate such behaviour from the ranks, says the head of the military’s sexual-misconduct response centre.

“If we’re going to address this problem writ large, we have to look at every part of the problem,” Denise Preston said Tuesday. “And the people who are committing this behaviour are central to the cause of the problem and to the solution of the problem.”

The Armed Forces has spent the past four years wrestling with how to eradicate sexual assaults and other inappropriate behaviour by establishing new support services for victims, educating service members and promising severe consequences for perpetrators.

Story continues below advertisement

Yet, assaults and harassment continue, much to the frustration and anger of senior commanders and normal service members given the damage to the military’s reputation and its effectiveness.

The military’s response to the sexual-misconduct “crisis” since 2014 has been largely reactive, Ms. Preston said, which was to be expected as the Armed Forces scrambled following a series of media articles and a searing independent review.

Now, however, the focus needs to turn toward prevention, she said. That includes not only changing the military’s culture, which it is trying to do, but also cultivating a better understanding of who is responsible for such behaviour – and why.

“The vast majority of people exist within this culture and don’t commit this kind of behaviour. … There’s a small number of people who commit this kind of behaviour,” she said.

“So what is it about this small number of people that encourages or promotes them or causes them to commit this behaviour even though there are all kinds of rules and [messages from senior leaders] and directives against it?”

That doesn’t mean the military should stop focusing on victims, said Ms. Preston, whose response centre recently started providing case workers to help those affected by sexual misconduct find counselling and other supports.

The continuing need for victim support was underlined in the response centre’s latest annual report, which said the number of people who contacted the institution last year grew by 20 per cent to 484.

Story continues below advertisement

Ms. Preston sees the fact more people called the centre last year as a sign that it’s becoming better known and appreciated within the military community since it was established in September, 2015, independent from the chain of command.

“We certainly don’t interpret that as an escalation in this as an issue within the forces,” she said.

The increase did coincide with what the Canadian Armed Forces says has been a steady decline in the number of complaints lodged by service members with their commanders over the past three years.

Yet, a report from the Canadian Forces’ military police released late last week said there was a marked increase in number of reported sexual assaults: 230 such complaints were filed with military police last year compared to 183 in 2017-18.

Ms. Preston acknowledged one of the main gaps in the military’s efforts to fight sexual misconduct is that different parts of the military have different numbers and information about incidents, which are often not centralized and contradict each other.

The issue has been flagged in the past as a concern and impediment, out of concern the military can’t act if it doesn’t really know what is going on inside its ranks.

Story continues below advertisement

“Where we’re weak as an organization is having good, robust, reliable, centralized data,” Ms. Preston said. “And that is definitely a priority for the organization, is figuring out how we do that.”

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter