Skip to main content

A law that would have made Ontario the first province in which drug companies were forced to publicly disclose their payments to doctors is in limbo with less than two months to go before the data collection was supposed to begin.

Premier Doug Ford’s Progressive Conservative government has not enacted the regulations that would bring into force the Health Sector Payment Transparency Act, legislation that was hailed as a major step toward openness in medical marketing when the former Liberal government passed it nearly a year ago.

Health Minister Christine Elliott’s office would not say whether the Tories intend to proceed with the transparency law or abandon it.

Story continues below advertisement

In the meantime, the legislation has been left to languish alongside other laws the Liberals passed but did not execute before they were swept out of office in June.

“We know, in many cases, the health sector did not feel that the prior government engaged in proper consultation when enacting legislation,” Hayley Chazan, the minister’s press secretary, said in an e-mailed statement that declined to answer specific questions about the transparency law. “That’s why our government is broadly consulting with partners in health care and reviewing all legislation that has not yet come into force as part of our efforts to develop a long-term transformational health strategy."

The law would have led to the release of massive amounts of new data about how the pharmaceutical industry tries to influence the practice of medicine in the province.

The physician-advocates and researchers who backed the legislation called that an unalloyed good, but Innovative Medicines Canada (IMC), which represents brand-name drug makers, warned last spring that the legislation was so sweeping it would impose a heavy “regulatory burden” and lead to a “material increase in corporate compliance expenditures” for drug companies.

IMC declined to comment on the status of the legislation on Monday, but said by e-mail that its “members are committed to ethical interactions with health-care professionals.”

Ontario’s legislation would have compelled all makers of drugs and medical devices to divulge payments of $10 or more to physicians, professional medical associations, patient advocacy groups, hospitals, universities and a long list of regulated health professionals, including pharmacists and nurses.

Right now, none of that information must be made public in Canada. In the United States, Japan, Australia and several European countries, searchable databases in some cases allow patients and researchers to look up physicians by name and see how much money they have received from pharmaceutical companies for work such as consulting, delivering speeches, sitting on advisory boards and running clinical trials.

Story continues below advertisement

Drug companies in Ontario were supposed to begin tracking payments in 2019 with an eye to reporting them publicly beginning in 2020. (The start date likely would have been delayed even if the Liberals had been re-elected because the draft regulations were not adopted before the election.)

Joel Lexchin, a Toronto emergency-room doctor and pharmaceutical-policy expert at York University, said he has e-mailed Ms. Elliott’s office repeatedly to ask about her government’s plans for the legislation. He said he has not received a response.

“I’ve been pointing out that, as a doctor, I regard this as important for transparency and to increase dialogue between doctors and patients,” he said.

Dr. Lexchin, one of the founders of a pro-transparency campaign called Open Pharma, added that the U.S. Physician Payments Sunshine Act has been a boon to researchers, who have linked its information with prescribing data to see how drug-company payments might influence which medications doctors recommend.

Alan Cassels, a Victoria-based pharmaceutical policy researcher and author, said it was a “major disappointment,” to see Ontario’s transparency legislation lie dormant, especially because British Columbia’s NDP government was looking to follow Ontario’s lead.

A spokeswoman for B.C.'s ministry of health said the government is reviewing the results of consultations on a possible health-sector transparency plan that were held over the summer.

Story continues below advertisement

“So much of our health care comes down to the prescription pad,” Ms. Cassels said. “Knowing that that there are organizations that are tilting the prescribing pen is, I think, really important. It affects all of us.”

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies