Skip to main content

Internal government documents show four federal departments have quietly spent months crafting an answer to a cross-party call for the government to end veterans homelessness by 2025.

The motion passed the House of Commons in June before the fall federal election.

It called for the government to deliver by next summer a plan to meet the target, which also included a special rent-assistance program for homeless veterans.

Story continues below advertisement

Accurate data about the number of homeless veterans in Canada remain elusive, but various studies peg the number at between 3,000 and 5,000 people, about 10 per cent of them women.

Social Development Minister Ahmed Hussen has told stakeholders in meetings of his interest in moving quickly on the issue given the cross-party support for the effort and identifiable policy options.

The Liberals’ Throne Speech this month included a promise that the government will help ensure “that every homeless veteran has a place to call home,” although it didn’t provide a timeline to do so.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s mandate letters to Mr. Hussen and Veterans Affairs Minister Lawrence MacAulay task them with building new affordable housing units for veterans that would include health, social and employment services for “veterans who need extra help.”

The letters don’t talk about a special housing stipend for veterans.

A briefing note to Mr. Hussen’s predecessor, Jean-Yves Duclos, obtained by The Canadian Press under the Access to Information Act, outlined stakeholders’ expectations that the forthcoming Canada Housing Benefit, which isn’t just for veterans, “would serve as a tool to directly address veteran homelessness.”

The benefit will be tied to a person instead of a social-housing unit, meaning tenants won’t lose the supplement if they move and allowing them to pay for rent in a private apartment rather than wait for a subsidized unit to become available.

Story continues below advertisement

In meetings with groups since becoming minister, Mr. Hussen has been asked to carve out a specific portion of the housing benefit for veterans amid worries they’ll be left off the list of people eligible. Officials told Mr. Duclos in the July 9 briefing note the concerns stem from provinces’ and territories’ reluctance to fund veterans’ housing because “they are considered a federal responsibility.”

Experts point to the success in the United States of direct housing benefits in reducing veterans homelessness as a case study for Canada.

The U.S. housing voucher program works similarly to the Canada Housing Benefit in that once a veteran no longer needs one of the allocated number of subsidies, it gets passed on to someone else.

If Canada were to take any lessons from the U.S., it would be to have the right programs, the necessary spending and political will, said Nan Roman, president of the Washington-based National Alliance to End Homelessness.

U.S. spending on housing, for instance, is roughly six times higher per capita for veterans than non-veterans, while pressure to act originally emanated out of the Obama White House and was echoed by local politicians, she said.

The result has been a 50-per-cent decline in the number of homeless veterans since 2010, including a 2.1-per-cent drop between 2018 and 2019, according to an annual report from the Department of Housing and Urban Development. The report, released days before Christmas, credited the drop to rental assistance and connected services from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.

Story continues below advertisement

The results have raised some hope that a similar approach could reduce homelessness in other groups, Ms. Roman said. The problem isn’t solved, but it’s dramatically improved.

“People totally took from this that it could be done,” she said. “Even though we didn’t make it and we didn’t do it everywhere people say that all the time: ‘Look what we did for veterans.’ ”

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Related topics

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies