Skip to main content

Canada From the comments: Readers react to news of LCBO once again stocking Norman Hardie wine

Today, readers are responding to the news that the LCBO will resume stocking Norman Hardie wine, six months after halting orders in the wake of widespread allegations of sexual misconduct.

LCBO is putting Norman Hardie wines back on its shelves.

Doug Ives/The Canadian Press

The wine and people working there did not attempt the sexual misconduct. He has to defend himself in court of law and pay the cost personally and not the employees of the company. People can refuse to buy the wine if they feel strongly about this but it is not job of LCBO to replace the courts in Ontario. - elbrowser

I disagree with some of the comments below. The Alcohol and Gaming Commission guidelines which is the basis of Mr. Hardie’s license to sell wines requires that he act with “honesty and integrity”. He has not acted with integrity in his dealings with his employees. To say that we don’t know what happens in other workplaces so we shouldn’t enforce in this case is like saying there are a lot of people who steal so the robber who is caught should not face consequences. And finally, to the person who characterized sexual harassment as an issue of political correctness, I say, with respect, you are wrong. Sexual harassment in the workplace is toxic for all the employees and needs to be called out. There is no easy out here. - JClaassen

Story continues below advertisement

The LCBO is the monopoly provider in the province. The government should not be in the business of making such morality judgements. The conduct of Mr. Hardie and the quality of the products his winery produces are two separate things. It should be up to consumers whether they choose to boycott the latter because of the former, not the government. - AdamTGAM

Preventing someone from making a living seems inappropriate in almost every instance of misdemeanour. For the LCBO to not sell his wine punishes N.H. himself -- but also his employees who would lose their jobs if the winery closed down due to being unlisted. Surely there’s a better way to respond to his unsavoury behaviour. Let the punishment fit the crime. - procenium

What else readers are discussing today:

From B.C. climate plan to target oil and gas production, by Justine Hunter

They approve site C but stand firmly against pipelines. They embrace the giant LNG project and then cut the legs out from under the petroleum producers. This is what blowing and sucking at the same time looks like. - pondus

In response to pondus:

No, this is what making a sensible plan to allow development and cut greenhouse gases looks like. The site C completion allows this. They don't want dilbit. Process it near the sands and you have a different story. - Beans Maroc

Story continues below advertisement

If B.C. were serious about reducing greenhouse gases, they would cease to be the largest exporter in North America of Thermal Coal - chris j phillips

There's probably nothing more frightening than a politician, a bureaucrat, a government, that thinks they're saving the world. - Ramsey0

Finally is sounds like we’re about to get a plan to move to a lower carbon future! We may not like what we see in a few hours but it will at least be a plan, which is something no one has yet prepared to go along with their criticism of our fossil fuel consumption. Next step is to see how much extra cost the plan will impose, and who will bear this cost? - BMracek

From the Comments is designed to highlight interesting and thoughtful contributions from our readers. Some comments have been edited for clarity. Everyone can read the comments but only subscribers will be able to contribute. Thank you to everyone furthering debate across our site.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter