Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

A photo provided by Google shows, from left, Sundar Pichai, the chief executive, and a Google researcher with Google's quantum computer machine.

GOOGLE /The New York Times News Service

In 200 seconds – the time it takes to poach an egg – a quantum processor has performed a numerical task faster than any known computer system on Earth.

Exactly how much faster is up for debate, but the breakthrough achievement led by researchers at Google AI in Mountain View, Calif., is the most convincing demonstration yet of a feat referred to as “quantum supremacy.” In essence, it means that a quantum computer – a device that leverages what Albert Einstein once described as “spooky” physics at the atomic scale – has attained a level of performance that is impractical, if not impossible, for conventional computer systems to emulate.

What’s more, researchers said, the design of their quantum processor is one that can be improved and scaled up. If that assessment proves correct, the device points the way to a game-changing technology that could revolutionize and disrupt a range of computer-related fields and applications.

Story continues below advertisement

“It’s really exciting because the physics came through. The physics was right,” said John Martinis, the senior scientist on the project, during a conference call with reporters on Wednesday. “There’s clearly a lot of hard things to solve … but we feel there’s a really great future ahead of us."

Though still a nascent technology, quantum computers offer a powerful advantage over standard digital computers in one key respect. While an ordinary computer operates based on bits of information that are designated by either 1 or 0 (corresponding physically to “off” or “on” in a circuit on a microchip), a quantum computer runs on “qubits” that quantum physics allows to hold a mixture of those values.

Qubits can also be linked up so that they can influence one another in ways that produce rapid short cuts for certain types of problems. Future applications of quantum computers range from cybersecurity and drug development to modelling financial markets.

The Google team developed a 53-qubit device, nicknamed Sycamore, and fed it a set of random instructions. They then sampled the answers the device provided in the form of strings of numbers one million times, effectively embedding the quantum characteristics of the system in the answers. While the exercise is neither commercially useful nor difficult for the device – the scientists compared it to writing a program that reads out “Hello world" – it requires a massive series of calculations to do the same thing without qubits.

In describing their experiment in the journal Nature, Dr. Martinis and his colleagues said it would take any existing state-of-the-art supercomputer about 10,000 years to reproduce Sycamore’s output.

The claim was quickly disputed by a team at IBM who issued a result showing that a supercomputer can be optimized to solve the problem in 2½ days, reducing the Google claim of quantum supremacy to the equivalent of winning by a nose rather than by a mile.

“Scientifically, both papers are right,” said David Poulin, a physicist at the University of Sherbrooke and co-director of a research program in quantum information science supported by the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research.

Story continues below advertisement

The IBM response illustrates that quantum supremacy is a moving target, Dr. Poulin added, thanks to constant improvements in the hardware and algorithms that underpin the world’s biggest computers. But while “that may take some of the gloss” off the Google announcement, he said that what matters more is that Sycamore has demonstrated that a quantum computer can be designed to operate at a scale that some theorists had speculated might be impossible in principle.

“It shows that quantum computing is here for real and a significant player on the computing landscape,” said Joseph Emerson, a faculty member at the University of Waterloo’s Institute for Quantum Computing. Dr. Emerson added that, going forward, each small increase in the capability of quantum computers will require exponential leaps by conventional computers to keep up.

But quantum computers still face big challenges. Among the biggest is the fact that as more qubits are added, it becomes increasingly difficult to maintain the conditions needed for reliable quantum computations. To get around this, quantum computers can have a portion of their qubits allocated to error correction. Dr. Emerson is the founder of Quantum Benchmark, a Waterloo startup that has developed a way to assess and improve the effectiveness of quantum error correction. The company is collaborating with Google and is set to play a role in future versions of its quantum chip.

On Wednesday, Dr. Martinis said that he expected that his team would have a working 1,000-qubit device in about a year, a scale at which quantum error correction would likely become essential.

Some of the team members behind the Google project were trained at the Waterloo institute or have other ties to Canada’s quantum computing ecosystem. Alexandre Blais, another expert in the field at the University of Sherbrooke, was one of the key originators of the interconnected superconducting loops that serve as the qubits for the Google system.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies