Skip to main content
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
Get full digital access to globeandmail.com
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
// //

Complainants are challenging a review body decision that allowed a federal judge to keep his job after he was accused of bias against Palestinians over his views on a proposed university appointment.

Several groups and individuals who complained last year about Justice David Spiro’s actions want the Federal Court to overturn the Canadian Judicial Council’s ruling that while Justice Spiro made serious mistakes, he should remain on the bench.

A notice of application was filed with the court Wednesday by the National Council of Canadian Muslims, the Arab Canadian Lawyers Association, the Canadian Muslim Lawyers Association, Independent Jewish Voices, and academics Craig Scott and Leslie Green.

Story continues below advertisement

A panel convened by the judicial council found Justice Spiro, a federal Tax Court judge, should not have weighed in on the appointment of Valentina Azarova as director of the international human rights program of the University of Toronto’s law faculty.

Ms. Azarova is an international law and human rights scholar based in Germany who has been critical of Israel’s treatment of Palestinians.

The judicial council said last month the panel had concluded that while Justice Spiro made mistakes, these were not serious enough to warrant a recommendation for his removal from office.

Before becoming a judge, Justice Spiro was a member of the board of directors at the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs. In September of last year, Justice Spiro learned from a centre staff member about Ms. Azarova’s imminent appointment, and the judge was asked whether he could approach the dean of the law faculty to relay these concerns.

Justice Spiro said it would be inappropriate to approach the dean. However, in a phone conversation the following day with an official and friend from the university, Justice Spiro mentioned the controversial nature of the appointment from the perspective of the Jewish community and the potential damage to the reputation of the university, the judicial council said.

Justice Spiro had been an engaged alumnus of the faculty who supported it financially and professionally, and from the review panel’s perspective this is what prompted the judge’s discussion with the university official, the council noted.

The review panel concluded that nothing in Justice Spiro’s career or work supported the suggestion of perceived bias on his part against Palestinian, Arab or Muslim interests.

Story continues below advertisement

“The fear of bias on the part of Justice Spiro is based on misinformation and speculation that is inaccurate,” the council said.

In their filing to the Federal Court, the complainants say the reasons for allowing Justice Spiro to stay on “were not justified, transparent and intelligible.”

They seek a declaration from the court that a threshold has been met requiring the judicial council to take the next step of holding an inquiry into Justice Spiro’s actions, which could lead to his removal.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies