Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }

The president of the Public Health Agency of Canada, the department in charge of the country’s pandemic preparedness and response strategy, has resigned.

Tina Namiesniowski, who was appointed to the job in May, 2019, informed staff in an internal e-mail on Friday that she was stepping aside. Her departure comes as PHAC faces questions over its handling of the country’s pandemic surveillance system, and its oversight of the emergency stockpile of protective equipment, while case numbers of COVID-19 rise across the country.

In the e-mail, which was obtained by The Globe and Mail, Ms. Namiesniowski said the job has taken a toll on her this year and she plans to reconnect with family.

Story continues below advertisement

“This is a very difficult decision for me but I think it’s the right one,” Ms. Namiesniowski said.

“I am now at the point where I need to take a break. Since it makes no sense for the agency to be without a president for any length of time given current circumstances, I feel I must step aside so someone else can step up,” she said.

The e-mail said a new president of the agency would be named next week.

“You really need someone who will have the energy and the stamina to take the agency and our response to the next level,” Ms. Namiesniowski said in the e-mail. “And, even though I might not have accomplished everything I would have liked to have done, I truly hope the foundation for change I’ve championed … will help serve as a road map going forward.”

Ottawa appoints new management to ‘strengthen’ pandemic surveillance system

The resignation follows a series of problems at the agency. These include the controversial curtailing of the country’s pandemic early warning and surveillance system in late 2018 and early 2019, which critics have said caused Canada to underestimate the threat of the outbreak; shortfalls in the national emergency stockpile that supply personal protective equipment to health care workers; and questions about whether Canada could have acted sooner to combat the virus.

The pandemic early warning and surveillance system, known as the Global Public Health Intelligence Network, or GPHIN, had much of its capabilities cut back prior to the pandemic. Despite picking up on the outbreak Dec. 31, after word of the virus had already begun to spread internationally, Public Health rated the threat posed to the country as “Low.” This threat assessment stayed the same throughout January, February and much of March, even after the World Health Organization warned in late January that the risk was high, and told countries to begin preparing.

PHAC has been criticized for missing some of the earliest and most important signals of the outbreak, including evidence that China was dealing with a serious health threat for much of December, and subsequent signals, such as mounting evidence in January and February that human-to-human transmission was a high risk.

Story continues below advertisement

In her e-mail Friday, Ms. Namiesniowski said: “It is hard to believe that close to ten months has elapsed since the agency picked up the initial GPHIN signal on December 31st, 2019, about a cluster of cases in Wuhan of an unknown respiratory illness.” However, she did not reference the criticism facing PHAC for its handling of GPHIN.

Amid shifting government priorities, scientists within GPHIN were assigned to other jobs that did not involve pandemic preparedness, such as tracking the health effects of vaping in Canada. That led to a reduction in intelligence gathering at Public Health, which hindered the government’s ability to properly assess risk, scientists inside the department said.

GPHIN is now the subject of two federal investigations. The Auditor-General is probing the oversight of the pandemic early warning and surveillance system and, last week, Health Minister Patty Hajdu ordered an independent review into the matter.

Public Health is also now grappling with pressing issues in the months ahead, such as the ability to secure vaccine supplies for the country, and bracing for a resurgence of the outbreak this fall, which has already begun.

Ms. Namiesniowski joined the federal government in 1989, and has a background in political science. Her resignation comes after the departure last week of PHAC vice-president Sally Thornton, who oversaw the pandemic early warning system and emergency stockpile. Ms. Thornton, who has a background in business and law, retired, said a spokeswoman for Public Health.

Public Health scientists have told The Globe that the department has been hampered in recent years by an influx of top officials who lack a grounding in science, and that doctors and epidemiologists often struggled to get urgent and important messages up the chain of command, because complex issues needed to be oversimplified.

Story continues below advertisement

Ms. Namiesniowski said she will support the transition to a new president, and praised the work of Chief Public Health Officer Theresa Tam. “I’ve felt privileged to work alongside of her,” she said of Dr. Tam.

“I know you will welcome my replacement who will be named early next week with open arms as you did me,” the e-mail said. “Whoever arrives will have new energy, new ideas and the ability to provide exceptional support to you, the minister and the country.”

Ms. Hajdu said in a statement that Ms. Namiesniowski has shown “unwavering commitment” in the job, adding, “We are all grateful.”

A spokesman for the department said the government would not comment further on the departure.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Coronavirus information
Coronavirus information
The Zero Canada Project provides resources to help you manage your health, your finances and your family life as Canada reopens.
Visit the hub
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies