Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Port of Montreal workers picket on the second day of their strike, in Montreal, on April 27, 2021.

Ryan Remiorz/The Canadian Press

The spokesman for a union representing striking dockworkers at Montreal’s port called on Thursday for an end to contentious scheduling practices before the workers are forced back on the job.

The appeal came after the House of Commons approved legislation early Thursday morning to put an end to the strike that has shut down one of Canada’s busiest ports.

Conservatives joined forces with the minority Liberal government to pass Bill C-29 by a vote of 255-61. Three Liberals, as well as Bloc Quebecois, NDP and Green MPs, voted against it.

Story continues below advertisement

The bill is aimed at quickly reopening the Port of Montreal, where the flow of millions of tonnes of goods came to halt after 1,150 dockworkers began a strike Monday morning. It must still be passed by the Senate, which is scheduled to deal with the bill Friday.

Union representative Michel Murray denounced the legislation at a news conference in Montreal Thursday and called on the government to clarify the working conditions under which the workers will have to return.

The Canadian Union of Public Employees, which represents the dockworkers, has said the current dispute was sparked by their employer, the Maritime Employers Association, imposing extended workday hours without consulting workers.

“It’s clearly an act of provocation by the employer,” Murray said. “How are going to go back to work with these schedules still in place?”

He claimed a special law would not have been needed had the employer simply ended the scheduling practice, because the workers would have willingly returned to the job. He said the union will challenge the legislation, which he described as “unconstitutional.”

He said the workers have also filed a complaint with the International Labour Organization, invoking two treaties Canada has ratified that deal with the right to strike. One of those treaties specifies that dock work “is not an essential service in the strict meaning of the term,” he said.

During late-night debate on the bill Wednesday, Labour Minister Filomena Tassi said if the strike is allowed to drag on it would cost the economy $40 million to $100 million per week, directly threatening 19,000 jobs and indirectly affecting hundreds of thousands of other jobs across the country.

Story continues below advertisement

And she said it’s a matter of life and death because the strike has left essential medical supplies and pharmaceuticals sitting in shipping containers as the COVID-19 pandemic rages.

“I cannot impress upon you enough, this situation is dire,” she told the Commons, where debate on the bill continued past midnight.

“The supply chains are critical and we have to keep goods moving. And this is really a situation where, for the health and safety of Canadians and the economy, we must take this action.”

Tassi said the back-to-work legislation is a last resort after more than two years of efforts to find a negotiated solution failed.

Workers at the port have been without a contract since December 2018 and started to refuse overtime and weekend work earlier this month.

The union previously held a 10-day strike in August.

Story continues below advertisement

Bloc Quebecois Leader Yves-Francois Blanchet said Wednesday that the strike could be called off immediately if the federal government ordered the employers association to cancel the work schedule changes.

“Take your damn phone, call them,” he said.

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh said the bill undermines the right to collective bargaining and will do long-term damage to relations between dockworkers and their employer that will cause tensions down the road.

The government was also criticized by the Conservatives for not doing enough to avert the strike. But leader Erin O’Toole had affirmed Tuesday that his party would support the legislation because of the potential damage a prolonged strike could cause Canada’s economy.

Manitoba Conservative MP Dan Mazier said he was “devastated” that government inaction led to the strike. Nevertheless, he said ending it is necessary to give assurance to farmers that they’ll receive needed shipments of seeds and fertilizer as they start planting their crops.

“I am standing up for jobs, I’m standing up for our economy and I’m standing up for my country,” he told the Commons.

Story continues below advertisement

The legislation would require dockworkers to return to work immediately after the bill receives royal assent.

It would extend their previous collective agreement until a new one is negotiated and prohibit any strikes or lockouts in the meantime. If negotiations fail again, the bill would impose a mediator-arbitrator on both parties

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies