Skip to main content

Canada Just for Laughs founder asks appeal court to toss class-action lawsuit

Just for Laughs founder Gilbert Rozon leaves the Quebec Court of Appeals, in Montreal, on May 16, 2019.

Ryan Remiorz/The Canadian Press

Just for Laughs founder Gilbert Rozon’s lawyer asked Quebec’s highest court on Thursday to throw out a $10-million class-action lawsuit claiming that the comedy impresario abused at least 20 women.

Lawyer Raymond Doray argued against a 2018 Quebec Superior Court decision authorizing the lawsuit on allegations of harassment and sexual misconduct.

Mr. Rozon denies the allegations by a group of women calling themselves “Les Courageuses,” which date between 1982 and 2016.

Story continues below advertisement

The accusations have not been tested by the courts.

In the Quebec Court of Appeal on Thursday, Mr. Doray argued that Superior Court Justice Donald Bisson was attempting to facilitate the denouncing of sexual assaults – a “commendable” goal but one that he said doesn’t fall within the criteria for a class action.

Mr. Doray argued that while the class action was born in the wake of the #MeToo movement, the fact it’s a “collective movement” doesn’t justify a “collective action.”

He argued that there were other avenues for lawsuits against Mr. Rozon, but a class action wasn’t one of them.

Mr. Doray said there’s no common link between the allegations, nor the women bringing them.

That means there is no way to look at them as a group and each case will have to be analyzed separately, and each woman will have to testify to her particular situation and lack of consent before a judge can conclude whether there is fault or not, he said.

Actress Patricia Tulasne, who represents the group, is the only one publicly identified. The other women’s identities are protected by a publication ban.

Story continues below advertisement

Bruce Johnston, one of the lawyers representing the women, called Justice Bisson’s judgment “impeccable.”

“Where is the error?” he asked the high court on Thursday.

“There are few areas where class action are as useful,” Mr. Johnston said of sexual assault. “It’s often the difference between recourse and … no recourse.”

The Court of Appeal will rule at a later date.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to
Comments are closed

We have closed comments on this story for legal reasons or for abuse. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

Cannabis pro newsletter