Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

A fire-destroyed property registered to Gabriel Wortman at 200 Portapique Beach Road in Portapique, N.S., May 8, 2020.

Andrew Vaughan/The Canadian Press

A lawyer representing the spouse of the man who murdered 22 people in Nova Scotia said Monday her client’s right to a fair trial could be jeopardized if portions of a redacted document are unsealed.

Lisa Banfield is among three people charged with unlawfully transferring ammunition to the gunman in the month before his rampage – but police have said she and the others had no prior knowledge of the gunman’s actions.

The document in question is a police application to obtain a search warrant for their investigation into the killings on April 18-19, 2020.

Story continues below advertisement

Banfield’s lawyer, Jessica Zita, told provincial court Judge Laurie Halfpenny MacQuarrie that a redacted portion of the document in question includes key details about the Crown’s case against her client, the release of which would undermine her right to a fair trial.

“I’m not disputing court openness principals,” Zita told the court in Port Hawkesbury, N.S.

“The public does have a right to be informed, especially of an event … that caused a seismic eruption to a small community so big it sent tremors nationwide … What I am asking, your honour, is that you manage that right with Ms. Banfield’s trial fairness rights.”

Zita went on to say the release of the Crown’s case “could jeopardize the integrity” of the justice system. “The strength of that argument lies in the fact that Ms. Banfield is not just simply an accused before this court. She’s also a victim. Her situation is different from that of her co-accused.”

Previously released court documents have revealed statements from Banfield saying she was attacked by her longtime partner on the night the shooting began. She also told police he had been abusive toward her in the past, though she didn’t report any of the incidents.

Lawyer David Coles, who represents a consortium of media outlets, said Banfield’s status as a victim was irrelevant to the case at hand. As well, he argued the release of the disputed information would not harm Banfield’s right to a fair trial because the case will be heard by a judge alone and not a jury.

“How can my friends possibly say there is a serious risk that the judge will say, ‘I don’t have to pay attention to the evidence, I’ll just read what’s in the Globe and Mail or what’s broadcast on the CBC and I’ll let that be my decision,’” Coles told the court.

Story continues below advertisement

“That’s not how it works.”

Zita also argued that another redacted section should remain off limits to the public because it is covered by solicitor-client privilege, which refers to the fact that communications between a lawyer and their client must remain confidential.

Zita confirmed in court there was a solicitor-client relationship between Banfield and Kevin Von Bargen, a Toronto-based lawyer who gave a statement to police saying he had been friends with the killer.

On Feb. 19, the Crown released a series of warrant applications, know as Information to Obtain documents or ITOs, that included previously redacted information about Von Bargen. In the documents, Von Bargen said he spoke with Gabriel Wortman after the COVID-19 pandemic took hold, saying his friend was convinced the global economy was about to implode.

As well, Von Bargen noted that his friend had withdrawn about $475,000 in cash a month before the rampage.

In court, Halfpenny MacQuarrie said she would release her decision on April 23 in Port Hawkesbury.

Story continues below advertisement

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies