Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Cancel Anytime
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Canada’s most-awarded
newsroom for a reason
Stay informed for a
lot less, cancel anytime
“Exemplary reporting on
COVID-19” – Herman L
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Matthew McKnight holds arms with his mother as they walk into court in Edmonton on July 10, 2020. Lawyers for McKnight are looking to have his five sexual-assault convictions set aside and a new trial ordered.

JASON FRANSON/The Canadian Press

Lawyers for convicted serial rapist Matthew McKnight say his five sexual-assault convictions should be set aside, and a new trial ordered on those charges, because the Crown prosecutor was “abusive” to Mr. McKnight in court and failed to act “in an even-handed way” with him during the trial.

“The Crown’s misconduct in this case jeopardized the appellant’s right to a fair trial and caused a miscarriage of justice,” reads the appeal factum filed by Edmonton law professor Peter Sankoff, who is working with Mr. McKnight’s trial lawyer, Dino Bottos.

The appeal, which the Alberta Court of Appeal will hear on Friday, alleges Crown prosecutor Mark Huyser-Wierenga was sarcastic and “used direct and cross-examination as a tool to voice his opinion that [Mr. McKnight] and defence witnesses were not to be believed and should be regarded with contempt.”

Story continues below advertisement

“The appellant’s trial was unfair,” the defence factum reads. “The convictions must be set aside and a new trial ordered as a consequence.”

The Crown says the convictions should stand, and is appealing Mr. McKnight’s eight-year prison sentence, asking the court to impose a longer term. During the trial, the Crown argued for a sentence of 22½ years.

Initially charged with three counts of sexual assault in the summer of 2016, Mr. McKnight at one point faced 26 charges of sexual and physical assault against 21 women. He stood trial on 13 counts of sexual assault. A jury convicted him on five charges, and found him not guilty of the other eight.

In July, 2020, Justice Doreen Sulyma sentenced Mr. McKnight to 16½ years in prison, but reduced that to eight years largely because of the totality principle, which says a sentence shouldn’t be unreasonably long for multiple offences. She made further reductions because of an assault he suffered on remand, changes he made to his lifestyle after being charged and what she found to be his “excellent chances to rehabilitate,” including a job awaiting him at his father’s investment firm.

During the trial in late 2019 and early 2020, the Crown alleged Mr. McKnight was a sexual predator, a popular and powerful figure in the Edmonton bar scene who used alcohol – and possibly GHB, the “date rape drug” – to incapacitate and rape women.

Mr. McKnight admitted to sexual activity with each of the women, but the defence argued it was consensual and the women were either mistaken or lying.

The trial lasted four months, and at times, emotions and tempers in the courtroom ran high. Testimony and cross-examination of the women who alleged sexual assaults regularly had to be paused as they became distraught, or, on occasion, lashed out angrily at Mr. Bottos during his lengthy and intense cross-examinations.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. McKnight testified in his own defence for about 10 days, and interactions between him and the prosecutor, Mr. Huyser-Wierenga, also at times became heated and confrontational.

“Over the course of 13 weeks, Crown counsel ignored or forgot his duty ‘to act in an even-handed way’ with a ‘lack of animus … towards the accused …’ ” the defence appeal says, citing case law that says the Crown’s job is not to secure a conviction but to put evidence fairly before a jury.

“The Crown’s performance in this case fell far short of the standard,” the defence says.

Some questions in cross-examination were “not legitimate questions,” the defence added, but “simply a vehicle for the Crown to express his opinion of the appellant in front of the jury.”

The defence is also arguing the trial judge was mistaken in her interpretation of a section of the Criminal Code around whether evidence about certain sexual activity should be admissible at trial.

In his response, Alberta Justice and Solicitor-General lawyer Matthew Griener said prosecutors are “entitled and indeed expected to conduct vigorous cross-examination of defence witnesses, including the accused,” and that any missteps were not significant enough to have compromised the fairness of the proceedings.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Griener also included examples of “sarcastic and dismissive” questioning by the defence, and said the defence’s closing argument was “replete with rape myths and offensive language” that went uncorrected by the judge, and which Mr. Griener says is relevant in assessing the overall fairness of the trial.

“This was a hard-fought trial, and both sides pressed their cases forcefully,” the Crown factum reads.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies