Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }

Senator Peter Harder, Government Representative in the Senate, shown leaving the Senate Chamber in Ottawa on June 19, 2018.

Justin Tang/The Canadian Press

The government has backed down from a procedural move that would have imposed deadlines on almost a dozen bills in the Senate to ensure they pass before Parliament rises in June.

Earlier this week, the Liberal government’s representative in the Senate moved to set specific timelines for debates and votes on 11 bills to break up what he described as a legislative logjam.

But Thursday afternoon, Sen. Peter Harder withdrew his motion, saying he had reached a “collegial understanding” with the leaders of other parties and groups in the Senate that will see legislation passed in a more timely fashion.

Story continues below advertisement

Harder isn’t making the details of the agreement public.

The Liberals are anxious to finalize a number of bills before the Oct. 21 election and time is growing short. Only eight weeks remain on the parliamentary sitting calendar before the summer break. After that, the federal election writ will wipe out any legislation left unfinished.

The list of bills the Trudeau government would like to pass includes Bill C-69, which would impose new rules for environmental assessments of energy projects, as well as C-71, which aims to tighten rules on gun ownership, including expanded background checks.

Harder has accused Conservative senators of using obstructionist tactics to purposely slow down legislation already passed by the House of Commons.

The government does have the ability to put time limits on debate, but usually only applies the measure to a single item.

Conservative senators cried foul over Harder’s attempt to bundle 11 bills into one omnibus motion, which included deadlines for votes on each bill.

Sen. Larry Smith, the Conservative leader in the Senate, called the procedural tactic an anti-democratic “time-allocation on steroids” and vowed to use every parliamentary tool available to stop it until Harder backed down.

Story continues below advertisement

Meanwhile, independent senators expressed concerned at the breakdown in negotiations between Harder, Conservative and Liberal senators over the schedule for when bills would be debated in the Senate.

Sen. Yuen Pau Woo, the point man for the Independent Senators Group, said earlier in the week he was blocked from participating in negotiations because his group is not recognized as an official caucus on par with the other partisan caucuses.

The makeup of the Senate – with the Independent Senators Group now forming a majority in the chamber coupled with the removal of senators from the federal Liberal caucus – has created a new dynamic in Senate that runs up against the rules and traditions of the upper chamber.

Senators have come up with informal ways to address roadblocks that arise, such as the dispute this week. Emmett Macfarlane, a political-science professor at the University of Waterloo has studied the issue in-depth, said the Senate may need to formalize some new ways of doing business.

“What happens when we get to a point where three-quarters of the Senate are independents? Do they continue to sit in this nebulous group and basically be a collection of individuals? Or do we formalize some type of organization around issue-based caucus or regional caucuses?” MacFarlane said.

“That’s something the Senate has not even tried to address as a collective and it might be worth looking at.”

Story continues below advertisement

He suggested changes to the rules and practices could be considered after the election, when the legislative agenda is clear and senators would have time to study and debate possible reforms.

Follow related topics

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies