Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Nova Scotia Premier Iain Rankin addresses workers at a vaccination clinic in Dartmouth, N.S., on June 3, 2021.

Andrew Vaughan/The Canadian Press

Nova Scotia Premier Iain Rankin’s apology for a previously undisclosed impaired driving conviction must be followed up with action on the issue, the head of Mothers Against Drunk Driving said Tuesday.

Andrew Murie, chief executive officer of MADD Canada, said Mr. Rankin should follow the examples of Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe and former B.C. premier Gordon Campbell, both of whom responded to revelations about drunk driving charges by taking a leadership role on the file.

In March 2003, Mr. Campbell was premier of British Columbia when he pleaded no contest to a drunk driving charge in Hawaii, following his roadside arrest two months earlier in Maui.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Murie said he was with Mr. Campbell when the Liberal premier later met with the victims of drunk drivers and committed to do more to combat impaired driving. British Columbia under the Campbell government was the first province to begin impounding the vehicles of drivers with a blood-alcohol content at 0.05 per cent. That measure resulted in a 50-per-cent reduction in impaired driving deaths in year after the legislation was introduced, Mr. Murie said.

Last October, Mr. Moe was in the middle of a provincial election campaign when he revealed he had been charged with impaired driving and leaving the scene of an accident when he was 20 – but he said the 1994 charges were later stayed.

Earlier in 2020, Mr. Moe disclosed that in 1997 he was ticketed for failing to come to a complete stop and driving without due care and attention in a collision in which a woman died. As well, he revealed that five years earlier, he was convicted of impaired driving when he was 18.

On Monday, Mr. Rankin confirmed he was convicted of drunk driving in 2003 and was cleared of a second drunk driving charge in 2005.

Mr. Murie said the premiers of Saskatchewan and B.C. both took decisive action to reduce drunk driving after the charges against them were made public – and Mr. Murie said Mr. Rankin should do the same.

“We’re definitely looking for some leadership on the issue,” he said. “It’s one thing to say, ‘I’m sorry.’ But can you actually put some of those words into action?”

David Johnson, a political studies professor at Cape Breton University, said the Premier did the right thing by disclosing the conviction, and he suggested Mr. Rankin was unlikely to face much political blowback.

Story continues below advertisement

“I think most Canadians are forgiving of these types of transgressions when someone is relatively younger,” Prof. Johnson said in an interview Tuesday. “The problems start for politicians when they lie about these issues.”

As an example, Prof. Johnson cited the former leader of the Nova Scotia NDP, Robert Chisholm, who failed to disclose a conviction when asked by a reporter if he had ever broken the law.

Just days before the conclusion of the 1999 provincial election campaign, a Halifax newspaper reported Mr. Chisholm had been convicted of drunk driving when he was 19 years old – a revelation that immediately became the focus of an election the NDP would lose.

“A lie is much worse that the actual initial offence,” Prof. Johnson said.

Mr. Rankin told reporters Monday he wanted to disclose his run-ins with the law because his office had received inquiries that morning about the previous cases. The Premier made the announcement as speculation mounted about a provincial election call.

On Tuesday, the Opposition Progressive Conservatives issued a statement accusing the Liberals of concealing the two arrests from the public over the eight years since Mr. Rankin was elected to the legislature. Mr. Rankin said Monday that when he first ran for office, he disclosed the incidents to former premier Stephen McNeil, and that he informed the Liberal Party about them when he ran for leader and won in February.

Story continues below advertisement

“While the Premier continues to limit questions from the media, we may never get all the answers,” said Tory legislator Barbara Adams, whose uncle was killed by a drunk driver when she was 18.

“I’m calling on the Premier to release all documents related to both of these incidents and let Nova Scotians decide if he has been honest and open about his behaviour.”

Provincial NDP Leader Gary Burrill issued a statement Tuesday saying Mr. Rankin wasn’t being forthright with the people of Nova Scotia because he didn’t disclose the conviction until “the media was asking questions.”

The Premier confirmed Monday he was fined and his licence was suspended in 2003 for driving while impaired, and that he was charged two years later with the same offence but was declared “innocent.”

He called his actions “selfish” and said he was “very, very sorry” for his behaviour.

Prof. Tom Urbaniak, who also teaches at Cape Breton University, said it’s unlikely Mr. Rankin’s conviction 18 years ago will have much of an impact on the looming campaign.

Story continues below advertisement

“But the public also expects a level of transparency,” he said. “The Premier had mentioned the disclosure to the party … But he hadn’t mentioned it to the public … It is better to be transparent than to be pushed into being transparent.”

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies