Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }

A polar bear standing on melting sea ice in Svalbard, Norway, in 2013.

KT MILLER/AFP/Getty Images

As climate change disproportionately warms the Arctic, the future looks increasingly bleak for one of the region’s most iconic species, an international team of researchers has found.

Specifically, if greenhouse gas emissions remain unchecked, “then it is highly likely that we’ll lose every polar bear population in the world before the end of the century,” said Peter Molnar, a researcher in global change ecology at the University of Toronto and lead author of a new study that tracks the bears’ fate through time under different emissions scenarios.

Only one out of 19 polar bear populations identified by the study has a chance at surviving a business-as-usual trajectory, Dr. Molnar said. A vestigial group could still be holding out 80 years from now on the Queen Elizabeth Islands, on the northwest fringe of Canada’s Arctic archipelago.

Story continues below advertisement

where the bears are

Researchers divided the global range of polar

bears into 19 subregions and studied the

effects of climate chance on each. In a busi

ness-as-usual emissions scenario, only the

Queen Elizabeth Islands population (QE) has a

chance of surviving to the end of the century.

RUSSIA

CS

LP

KS

U.S.

SB

NB

BS

QE

VM

NW

KB

LS

MC

CANADA

EG

GB

BB

WH

FB

BRITAIN

SH

FRANCE

DS

Atlantic Ocean

Polar bear ecoregions

Seasonal Ice Ecoregion (SIE)

Western Hudson Bay (WH)

Southern Hudson Bay (SH)

Davis Strait (DS)

Foxe Basin (FB)

Baffin Bay (BB)

Divergent Ice Ecoregion (DIE)

Southern Beaufort Sea (SB)

Chukchi Sea (CS)

Laptev Sea (LP)

Kara Sea (KS)

Barents Sea (BS)

Convergent Ice Ecoregion (CIE)

East Greenland (EG)

Northern Beaufort Sea (NB)

Queen Elizabeth Islands (QE)

Archipelago Ecoregion (AE)

M’Clintock Channel (MC)

Gulf of Boothia (GB)

Viscount Melville Sound (VM)

Lancaster Sound (LS)

Norwegian Bay (NW)

Kane Basin (KB)

ivan semeniuk and JOHN SOPINSKI/THE GLOBE

AND MAIl, SOURCE: Peter Molnár, Nature

Climate Change

where the bears are

Researchers divided the global range of polar bears into

19 subregions and studied the effects of climate chance

on each. In a business-as-usual emissions scenario, only

the Queen Elizabeth Islands population (QE) has a

chance of surviving to the end of the century.

RUSSIA

CS

LP

KS

U.S.

SB

NB

BS

QE

VM

NW

KB

LS

MC

CANADA

EG

GB

BB

WH

FB

BRITAIN

SH

FRANCE

DS

Atlantic Ocean

Polar bear ecoregions

Convergent Ice Ecoregion (CIE)

Seasonal Ice Ecoregion (SIE)

East Greenland (EG)

Western Hudson Bay (WH)

Northern Beaufort Sea (NB)

Southern Hudson Bay (SH)

Queen Elizabeth Islands (QE)

Davis Strait (DS)

Foxe Basin (FB)

Baffin Bay (BB)

Archipelago Ecoregion (AE)

Divergent Ice Ecoregion (DIE)

M’Clintock Channel (MC)

Southern Beaufort Sea (SB)

Gulf of Boothia (GB)

Chukchi Sea (CS)

Viscount Melville Sound (VM)

Laptev Sea (LP)

Lancaster Sound (LS)

Kara Sea (KS)

Norwegian Bay (NW)

Barents Sea (BS)

Kane Basin (KB)

ivan semeniuk and JOHN SOPINSKI/THE GLOBE AND MAIl

SOURCE: Peter Molnár, Nature Climate Change

where the bears are

Researchers divided the global range of polar bears into 19 subregions and studied the effects

of climate chance on each. In a business-as-usual emissions scenario, only the Queen Eliza-

beth Islands population (QE) has a chance of surviving to the end of the century.

RUSSIA

CS

LP

KS

U.S.

SB

NB

BS

QE

VM

NW

KB

LS

MC

CANADA

EG

GB

BB

WH

FB

BRITAIN

SH

FRANCE

DS

Atlantic Ocean

Polar bear ecoregions

Convergent Ice Ecoregion (CIE)

Seasonal Ice Ecoregion (SIE)

East Greenland (EG)

Western Hudson Bay (WH)

Northern Beaufort Sea (NB)

Southern Hudson Bay (SH)

Queen Elizabeth Islands (QE)

Davis Strait (DS)

Foxe Basin (FB)

Baffin Bay (BB)

Archipelago Ecoregion (AE)

Divergent Ice Ecoregion (DIE)

M’Clintock

Channel (MC)

Southern Beaufort Sea (SB)

Gulf of Boothia (GB)

Chukchi Sea (CS)

Viscount Melville Sound (VM)

Laptev Sea (LP)

Lancaster Sound (LS)

Kara Sea (KS)

Norwegian Bay (NW)

Barents Sea (BS)

Kane Basin (KB)

ivan semeniuk and JOHN SOPINSKI/THE GLOBE AND MAIl

SOURCE: Peter Molnár, Nature Climate Change

Alternatively, in an intermediate climate scenario in which carbon emissions peak and then drop after 2040, polar bear populations will experience significant stress at the southern edge of their current range, but the more northerly populations “have a good chance of persisting,” Dr. Molnar said.

While it’s long been known that polar bears are increasingly at risk as the Arctic warms, the study, published Monday in the journal Nature Climate Change, is the most detailed effort yet to establish when polar bears in different areas are mostly likely to cross nutritional thresholds that could trigger population collapse.

Globally, the size of the polar bear population is difficult to assess, but current estimates range between 21,500 to 25,000, Dr. Molnar said. The study did not attempt to track overall population numbers but instead looked at the future viability of the species by combining what is known about polar-bear physiology with climate models that forecast sea-ice extent across the Arctic Ocean over the rest of the century.

Sea ice is crucial to the bears’ continued survival because the powerful carnivores feed off of seals that must periodically come to the surface at breathing holes that they maintain in the ice.

When faced with open water, polar bears are not able to capture seals. In places where sea ice has disappeared for the summer, bears must fast and live off of their fat stores until they can resume hunting.

For the bears, the question is “how full is your tank before you have to get through this period?” Dr. Molnar said.

In the study, the team looked at the maximum and minimum amount of fat that adult bears can store on their bodies and linked this to the viability of populations in different ecoregions as sea ice diminished and periods of open water increased. At various points, the projections showed different populations crossing thresholds in which starvation and loss of young becomes inevitable.

Story continues below advertisement

By about the year 2090 under the business-as-usual emissions scenario, the projections showed even those individual bears that are most capable of gathering and storing fat when food is available will be unable to overcome the challenge of increasingly longer fasting periods.

Dr. Molnar said there are two factors that could cement the polar bears’ fate even sooner. One is natural climate variability, which could lead to a faster disappearance of sea ice than the average indicated by the climate models. In that case, a few warmer-than-average seasons could hasten starvation for many bears. Another is the fact that when sea ice is present but relatively thin and fractured, polar bears must burn more calories manoeuvring through the terrain than they would in places where the ice is stable and forms a supportive surface.

Andrew Derocher, a wildlife biologist at the University of Alberta who was among the first to highlight the threat that climate change poses to polar bears but who was not involved in the new study, said the results expand and refine what was previously known about the problem.

“It also covers a broader geographic area than any other previous work,” he said. “So we’re getting a better global perspective on what the fate of polar bears is likely to be.”

The results highlight the fact that meaningful action on climate change is required in the near term to ensure continued survival of the species. The alternative would require extraordinary measures, such as feeding and maintaining a remnant group of polar bears that may be still lingering in Canada’s far north at the end of the century.

Dr. Derocher added that if carbon emissions continue at their current pace, humanity will be facing so many challenges by then that it seems unlikely that polar bears will be given high priority.

Story continues below advertisement

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies