Skip to main content
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

More pressure tubes at the Bruce Nuclear Generating Station were found to contain hydrogen concentrations in excess of regulatory limits.

ALLISON KENNEDY

Unexpectedly high levels of hydrogen in pressure tubes at a nuclear power plant in Ontario have renewed questions about how long Canada’s aging CANDU reactors can continue to operate safely.

At a meeting before the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) on Friday, officials confirmed more pressure tubes at the Bruce Nuclear Generating Station on the eastern shore of Lake Huron were found to contain hydrogen concentrations in excess of regulatory limits, and above what the industry expected. Bruce Power disclosed in July that it had discovered two tubes that exceeded regulatory limits.

The cause has not been determined, nor is it clear how many other pressure tubes in Canadian reactors might also be affected. Bruce Power did not answer questions from The Globe late Friday on how many additional tubes were found to violate the station’s licensing requirements.

Story continues below advertisement

Pressure tubes are six-metre rods that contain fuel bundles of uranium, and are considered the major life-limiting component in CANDUs, the reactors in all of Canada’s nuclear power plants. Tubes containing high hydrogen concentrations are more vulnerable to fracturing if they have pre-existing cracks. If one ruptures, coolant could be lost, which could trigger a range of scenarios from a relatively minor incident contained by the plant’s safety systems to a catastrophe in which fuel overheats.

The issue is particularly a concern when the reactor is below normal operating temperatures, such as during shutdown or startup.

Reactors at Bruce nuclear station violated terms of operating licence

As decades-long search for nuclear waste site nears end, communities face tough decision

Alexandre Viktorov, director-general of the CNSC’s power reactor regulation directorate, said CNSC staffers were satisfied with the industry’s response, which included increased inspection of pressure tubes and reviewing known cracks. “Continued reactor operation does not pose unreasonable risk,” he added.

The CNSC has imposed various regulations concerning pressure tubes, including a maximum permissible hydrogen concentration of 120 parts per million. Until now, the industry has relied on a combination of inspections and predictive modelling to estimate when tubes would reach that limit. The levels at the Bruce station indicate those predictive models have failed.

The Bruce station has eight reactors, each containing 480 pressure tubes; the offending tubes were found in Units 3 and 6, neither of which is operating. One tube in Unit 6 exhibited readings of 211 parts per million, approaching double the regulatory limit, and far above Bruce Power’s prediction of 100 ppm. Bruce Power officials said all of the elevated readings were discovered in the same region, close to one end of the tube.

“Based on hundreds of inspections, reinspections, and recently carried out enhanced inspection activities in Unit 3, we can affirm that there are no flaws in this region,” said Chris Mudrick, the company’s chief nuclear officer. “Our pressure tube integrity remains strong.”

Frank Greening, a retired Ontario Power Generation chemist who worked in the company’s pressure tube group for the last decade of his career, warned that it’s possible the rate of hydrogen pickup may have accelerated in older tubes in the past few years.

Story continues below advertisement

“And if that’s true, then the rate at which it’s going in is scary,” he said.

He added: “There is something happening that’s quite serious. And they’re saying ‘We don’t know how or why it’s happening.’ It’s pathetic. I can’t accept that.”

A CNSC commissioner, Marcel Lacroix, said during the meeting that industry officials had not satisfactorily explained what might be causing the problem.

“There are many potential reasons for this phenomenon, and we weren’t able to nail [it] down exactly,” Dr. Viktorov said.

In late July, the CNSC imposed new requirements on Bruce Power and two other utilities operating CANDU reactors (Ontario Power Generation and New Brunswick Power). Before restarting reactors, the utilities would need to carry out additional inspections to “demonstrate a high degree of confidence” that the tubes remained under the regulatory limit for hydrogen concentration, or show that no flaws existed in the specific area of the reactor’s tubes where the high levels at Bruce Station were discovered.

In a presentation to the CNSC on Friday, OPG officials said pressure tubes at the company’s Darlington and Pickering stations “are not experiencing similar levels of degradation” seen at Bruce station, and that its own tubes were within licensing limits “with considerable margins.” New Brunswick Power said the tubes at its Point Lepreau station were “relatively young.”

Story continues below advertisement

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies