Skip to main content
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

New Brunswick cannot sue accounting firm Grant Thornton over an allegedly flawed audit which led the province to backstop hefty loans to a company that soon ran into financial trouble, the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled.

In a 7-0 decision Thursday, the high court concluded the province did not file its claim against Grant Thornton within the allowable time limit.

Events in the case began when the Atcon group of companies secured $50-million in loan guarantees from the province after Grant Thornton carried out an audit of Atcon’s financial statements for the fiscal year ending Jan. 31, 2009.

Story continues below advertisement

Atcon ran out of working capital four months later, prompting the bank that loaned the money to seek the total amount of the guarantees, which the province paid in early 2010.

The province hired a second auditor, which found in a February 2011 draft report that Atcon had considerably overstated its financial position. A final report was completed in November 2012. The province took court action against Grant Thornton in June 2014 for its alleged negligence on the first audit.

Grant Thornton disputed the allegations and moved to have the action tossed out, arguing it came too late.

A judge allowed Grant Thornton’s motion to halt the action on the basis that more than two years had passed since the province had discovered the relevant facts of its claim, but the decision was overturned by the province’s court of appeal.

Writing for a majority of the Supreme Court, Justice Michael Moldaver said the appeal court had adopted too high a standard for triggering the start of the two-year time-frame set out in provincial law.

A claim is discovered when the plaintiff has knowledge of the material facts upon which “a plausible inference of liability” on the defendant’s part can be drawn, Moldaver wrote.

“It follows from this standard that a plaintiff does not need knowledge of all the constituent elements of a claim to discover that claim.”

Story continues below advertisement

Moldaver said he was satisfied that New Brunswick knew or ought to have known by February 2011 that Grant Thornton might be liable, yet the province did not go to court until more than three years later.

The Supreme Court set aside the appeal court judgment and restored the initial judge’s decision to end the province’s action.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies