Skip to main content

Canada Ontario doctors’ college dismisses gun-control complaints against Toronto surgeon

Trauma surgeon Dr. Najma Ahmed, poses for a photograph in a trauma room at St. Michaels Hospital in Toronto, on Wednesday March 6 2019.

Christopher Katsarov/The Globe and Mail

Ontario’s regulatory college for doctors has dismissed complaints lodged by members of a firearm advocacy group against a Toronto trauma surgeon advocating for tighter gun control.

Najma Ahmed, the physician at the centre of about 70 complaints lodged by gun advocates, said Wednesday the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario informed her it will not investigate the complaints.

The response from the college says a committee has determined the complaints are “frivolous” and “vexatious” and don’t warrant further investigation, she said.

Story continues below advertisement

“I’m pleased with the CPSO’s statement and that it affirms the important position that physicians have as integral stewards of the health-care system and that we have an important role to play as health-care advocates in the public-health realm,” Dr. Ahmed said Wednesday.

The Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights (CCFR) started a campaign last month encouraging members to file complaints about Dr. Ahmed with the CPSO, using the “stay in your lane” mantra in online posts – the same line the U.S. National Rifle Association has directed at doctors advocating for stricter gun control.

Dr. Ahmed has been singled out by the group since she helped found Canadian Doctors for Protection from Guns, an advocacy group formed last month highlighting the public health implications of gun-related injuries and deaths. The group is calling for a handgun and assault-weapon ban, as well as other measures to reduce gun-related deaths and injuries.

On its website and social media channels, the CCFR has described Dr. Ahmed and the other members of the advocacy group as “radical” and “unethical” and said their push for gun control is “unprofessional.” An online post dated Feb. 5, the CCFR provided step-by-step instructions to its members how to file complaints about Dr. Ahmed and told her “stay in your lane.”

CCFR director Rod Giltaca could not be reached immediately on Wednesday.

Opinion: Taking aim at doctors on gun control highlights firearms as a public-health issue

Toronto trauma surgeon target of complaints by gun-rights advocacy group

Complainants have 30 days to appeal the decision and prove the college has failed to consider concrete evidence demonstrating the complaints are not frivolous or vexatious.

In an interview last week, CPSO registrar Nancy Whitmore said it is unusual for the college to receive complaints relating to a doctor’s advocacy work. The college primarily handles complaints tied to patient outcomes or a doctor’s conduct.

Story continues below advertisement

The debate over gun control has become heated in Canada recently as the federal government considers the possibility of a handgun and assault-weapon ban and Bill C-71 makes its way through the Senate. The bill would require more detailed background checks and require retailers to keep records of firearm sales.

The CCFR’s position is that firearm owners are law-abiding citizens and that further restrictions won’t solve the problem of gun violence in cities like Toronto, where illegal guns are being used in many crimes.

Canadian Doctors for Protection from Guns argues that reducing the amount of guns available will result in a reduction of gun-related injuries and deaths.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter