Skip to main content

A Toronto woman convicted of terror charges grew increasingly preoccupied with the notion that the Canadian government was spying on her in the years before she carried out an attack at a Canadian Tire while draped in an Islamic State banner.

In a newly released psychiatric report, Rehab Dughmosh said she first began to feel persecuted by authorities in 2013, when she tried to obtain her Canadian citizenship and was turned away for refusing to remove her niqab in court.

Shortly afterwards, Ms. Dughmosh heard about the Islamic State on the news and started watching their videos daily, which she felt caused the government to increase its surveillance of her, according to the report, which was issued last fall and sealed until now.

Story continues below advertisement

The 34-year-old became “increasingly distressed” because she believed the government had placed cameras in her home, prompting her to put tinfoil on light fixtures and cover up electrical sockets and vents, the report says.

In early 2016, she began to hear voices she believed were from the government and which told her to hurt herself and others, the report says. In one instance, her anguish over the voices led her to try to remove one of her teeth with a knife, an injury that left her with a dead tooth, it says.

“The worsening of her psychotic state over time resulted in severe functional decline and adverse interpersonal consequences, as manifested by her social withdrawal, failure to adequately manage her household/familial responsibilities, and marital demise,” the document reads.

“Her behaviour was concerning and impairing to such a degree that her family made repeated unsuccessful attempts to connect her with psychiatric care prior to the June 2017 index offences.”

Ms. Dughmosh’s adoption of extreme religious views coincided with the start of her illness, but does not “directly flow” from her mental disorder, the report says.

“In the context of an evolving delusional process and corresponding confusion and distress, the adoption of a new or exaggerated belief system serves to provide a more stable sense of self at a time when self-concept and personality are undergoing significant changes,” it says.

While Ms. Dughmosh appeared able to appreciate the nature and quality of her actions at the time, she was also in the grips of psychosis, experiencing “paranoid and persecutory delusions” that caused her intense distress and may have robbed her of the ability to consider other options, the document says.

Story continues below advertisement

“She was viewing the world through the distorted lens of a paranoid individual who was increasingly feeling anger, despair and helplessness,” it said. “Through this lens, while having a general understanding of the moral wrongfulness of her actions, it is possible that she was unable to rationally apply this understanding to her decisions.”

The report, which was presented as evidence Monday as an Ontario judge begins to determine an appropriate sentence, did not rule out that Ms. Dughmosh could be found not criminally responsible for her actions and said she will need continuing treatment for her mental illness.

Ontario Superior Court Justice Maureen Forestell said she will examine assessments already conducted and decide whether any additional ones are required. A sentencing hearing will be held at a later date.

Ms. Dughmosh objected to having the report unsealed Monday, saying through an interpreter that she did not want Justice Forestell to read it because she had “provided misleading and false statements” during the assessment.

Crown prosecutors, who suggested the judge review the report, said they found it contained some “problematic findings” that they dispute. They said, however, that it has always been their position that Ms. Dughmosh had a mental illness at the time of the attack and it should be a mitigating factor in sentencing.

Ms. Dughmosh was convicted last week of several terror charges in connection with the June, 2017, attack at a Canadian Tire in an east Toronto mall.

Story continues below advertisement

She was also found guilty on another charge related to a failed attempt to join the Islamic State in Syria in 2016.

An agreed statement of facts read in court last week – the only evidence presented to jurors – said Ms. Dughmosh began contemplating an attack in Toronto about a year after her return from that trip.

The document said she built an arsenal of makeshift weapons but her estranged husband confiscated them at the last minute and she was forced to change her plans.

She went to Canadian Tire intending to purchase more weapons but discovered she hadn’t brought her wallet, causing her to change course again and carry out the attack in the store with a golf club she found in the sporting goods section and a butcher knife she had smuggled under her robe, it said.

Ms. Dughmosh, who represented herself and participated only minimally in her legal proceedings, was found fit to stand trial.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies