Skip to main content

An alert warning Ontario residents of an unspecified incident at the Pickering Nuclear Generating Station early Sunday morning was sent in error, Ontario Power Generation said.

Frank Gunn/The Canadian Press

The Ontario government is conducting an investigation after an emergency alert about an incident at a nuclear facility was mistakenly sent to millions of residents Sunday, causing many to fear a serious safety threat was imminent.

Solicitor-General Sylvia Jones said in a statement the alert was issued by mistake during a routine training exercise by the Provincial Emergency Operations Centre (PEOC).

She said there was never any danger to the public or the environment. Training exercises are an important component of emergency management and are conducted “regularly,” said Ms. Jones, who oversees the PEOC.

Story continues below advertisement

The province is apologizing for the error and is conducting an investigation to determine what happened and to prevent it from occurring again.

The emergency alert was broadcast early Sunday morning, warning of an incident at the Pickering Nuclear Generating Station, east of Toronto. The alert was directed at residents who lived within 10 kilometres of the plant and said that no abnormal release of radioactive material occurred during the incident. Another alert was issued about two hours later clarifying that there was no emergency and that the first alert was sent by mistake.

The province’s apology is unlikely to quell public questions and concerns about how such an alert could have been mistakenly broadcast. The mayors of Pickering and Toronto have both called for full investigations and say there are many questions that need to be answered.

Pickering Mayor Dave Ryan wrote on Twitter that while he’s relieved there was no emergency, “I am upset that an error such as this occurred.”

Toronto Mayor John Tory wrote on Twitter he is looking forward to the results of the investigation “so we know how this error happened & what steps will be taken to ensure it doesn’t happen again."

In a statement, federal Public Safety Minister Bill Blair said the false alarm “created anxiety.”

“Canadians rightly expect to be able to rely on the accuracy of these lifesaving services,” Mr. Blair said.

Story continues below advertisement

The Pickering Nuclear Generating Station is one of the largest nuclear plants in the world and has been operating since the early 1970s. There has been a handful of safety incidents since the plant opened, including a pipe break in 1994 that led to a major loss of coolant and a spill of 185 tonnes of heavy water.

Ontario Power Generation (OPG), a Crown corporation that owns and operates the Pickering facility, said on Sunday there were no safety incidents and that the emergency alert was issued in error.

“OPG has a sophisticated and robust notification process in place that we would immediately follow in the unlikely event of an incident at the station,” chief nuclear officer Sean Granville said. “I want to assure the public that there was no incident at the station, and the plant is operating as designed.”

News the emergency alert was sent by mistake is prompting questions about how the error occurred.

CHRIS HELGREN/Reuters

The false alarm is reminiscent of another high-profile incident of an emergency alert sent by mistake in Hawaii. In January, 2018, a false emergency alert was sent to residents of Hawaii warning them of an incoming ballistic missile and advising them to seek shelter immediately. The alert caused widespread panic until another alert, issued about 45 minutes later, told residents the first alert was sent by mistake. An employee sent that alert during a training exercise that he mistakenly believed was real.

Jennifer McKelvie, a Toronto city councillor who represents constituents living within 10 kilometres of the Pickering nuclear facility, said the province must ensure this doesn’t happen again in order to ensure public trust in the system.

“We don’t want to create a situation where it’s like crying wolf and residents start to ignore them,” she said on Sunday. “We need to make sure we don’t have false alarms going forward.”

Story continues below advertisement

The province’s Auditor-General highlighted issues with Ontario’s emergency management in her 2017 annual report. Bonnie Lysyk found that provincial emergency management programs needed better oversight and co-ordination.

Ontario doesn’t have a co-ordinated IT system for emergency management, the auditor wrote. The province tried to implement one in 2009, but discontinued the project six years later, “having spent about $7.5-million without it ever going live.”

With a report from The Canadian Press

Related topics

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies