Skip to main content

Students across Ontario walked out of class on Friday to protest the provincial government’s decision to repeal a modernized version of the sex-ed curriculum.

The walkouts – called “We the students do not consent” – took place in schools from Niagara Falls to Ottawa and saw students gather outdoors, hoist handwritten signs and chant about the need for relevant sexual education.

“Some adults, such as [Premier] Doug Ford, may have grown up in a different time,” said Luca Lichner, a 16-year-old who walked out of one Toronto school. “With times changing and everything updating, we should also update our sex education instead of going back in time.”

Story continues below advertisement

The province’s Progressive Conservative government announced in July that it would scrap the modernized sex-ed curriculum brought in by the previous Liberal regime in 2015.

That document included warnings about online bullying and sexting, but opponents, especially social conservatives, objected to parts addressing same-sex relationships, gender identity and masturbation.

Late last month, the government released a curriculum meant to temporarily replace the modernized version. Observers have said it makes passing mention of modern concepts such as the internet and cellphones but largely reverts to the vague language and broad topic outlines used in the previous curriculum last updated in 1998.

Ms. Lichner said she worried her younger brothers – aged 5 and 9 – may not be taught about issues such as sexting and same-sex relationships as thoroughly as they would have been before.

“If they would be growing up under this government, if they are not taught about these issues then I would be greatly concerned for them,” she said.

As they protested, Ms. Lichner and her peers carried signs emblazoned with slogans such as “1998 called: it wants its curriculum back” and sang songs such as Salt-N-Pepa’s Let’s Talk About Sex. Others carried rainbow-coloured signs in a nod to the LGBTQ issues critics say aren’t properly reflected in the revised curriculum.

“We find it appalling that we don’t have a curriculum that is up to date,” said Frank Hong, a Grade 12 student who helped organize the rallies. “For some vulnerable teens, these are issues of life or death.”

Story continues below advertisement

Those sorts of concerns for a younger generation were shared by Indygo Arscott, a 16-year-old who is two-spirit and uses gender neutral pronouns.

“When I was growing up, [the old curriculum] made me feel alienated … all I learned about was heterosexual relationships or identifying as either a male or a female,” they said. “There’s a lot of kids that are going to feel alienated.”

When asked for comment on the student protests, a spokeswoman for the Education Minister noted that the province was launching public consultations on a new sex-ed curriculum next week and encouraged people to participate.

Friday’s student action also aimed to voice opposition to the cancellation of curriculum-writing sessions designed to fulfill findings of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, a move Indygo Arscott described as a step backward.

“It’s time that kids in especially the public school system get educated about Indigenous issues and Indigenous history, especially from the perspective of Indigenous people,” they said.

The sessions, which were set to take place in July, had been aimed at enhancing Indigenous perspective in the province’s curriculum. The government also scrapped curriculum-writing sessions on American Sign Language and Indigenous Languages in kindergarten set for the same time as a cost-cutting measure.

Story continues below advertisement

At the time, a spokesman for the Ministry of Education said the government would still work with “experts, elders and Indigenous communities” to develop “support materials” for the updated curriculum, but did not provide any specifics.

The province has said a new sex-ed curriculum is expected for the 2019-20 school year.

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter