Skip to main content

Patrick Brown.

Patrick Brown is expected to avoid a formal reprimand for breaking Ontario’s ethics rules, as neither the Liberals nor the Progressive Conservatives intend to call for a debate in the legislature into the former Tory leader’s financial affairs.

Integrity Commissioner J. David Wake has recommended that Mr. Brown be reprimanded on the floor of the legislature for failing to disclose a $375,000 loan from a close friend who later went on to become a Tory candidate. His report marked only the second time the watchdog’s office has proposed such a penalty for an MPP.

When asked if Doug Ford, Mr. Brown’s successor as leader, plans to call for a debate, a spokesman would say only that, “We are focused on the future and getting our province back on track for the people of Ontario.” A spokesman for the Liberal House Leader’s office said it is up to Tory MPP Randy Hillier, who made the complaint that launched Justice Wake’s investigation, to table a formal motion to debate his report in the legislature.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Hillier said that as a backbench opposition member, he has no authority to ask the legislature to address the matter and accused the government of reneging on its obligations. “This will do a significant disservice to the House,” said Mr. Hillier, whose complaint cited, among other things, a Globe and Mail report on a proposed $375,000 deal between Mr. Brown and Jass Johal, the close friend.

Justice Wake’s report not only raises questions about the source of funds Mr. Brown used for a down payment on a five-bedroom, waterfront house, but also reveals that senior staff in his office were concerned about the carrying costs on his mortgage and discussed topping up his salary with PC Party funds. As an additional “protective measure,” the report says, Mr. Brown’s staff recommended that his personal bank account be taken over by a private banker “to make sure nothing slipped through the cracks.”

The process of “professionalizing” Mr. Brown’s finances was never completed as he resigned as leader in January, the report says. Mr. Brown was forced to step down over allegations of sexual misconduct, which he has denied. He was also ejected from the Tory caucus and now sits as an independent member.

The writ drops on Wednesday for the June 7 provincial election, leaving no time to address the report in the current legislative session. In 2006, after three days of debate, the legislature reprimanded then-Liberal cabinet minister Harinder Takhar after a former Integrity Commissioner found he had violated ethics rules.

In the case of Mr. Brown, Justice Wake found that he avoided scrutiny over his down payment by concealing the true source of funds when he applied for a mortgage, saying he was “less than transparent” with Toronto-Dominion Bank. His report revealed that Mr. Brown obtained a $1.72-million mortgage to buy a $2.3-million house near Barrie in the summer of 2016, after approaching James Dodds, a TD vice-president and his long-time friend.

Mr. Dodds referred questions to TD spokeswoman Julie Bellissimo, who declined to say whether the bank is reviewing the loan. “For privacy and confidentiality reasons, we do not discuss any of our customer relationships, transactions and accounts,” she said in an e-mail.

Mr. Brown did not tell TD he had received a $375,000 loan for the bulk of his down payment from Mr. Johal, a Brampton paralegal. Instead, he provided his mortgage specialist with an affidavit from Mr. Johal, saying he had bought the politician’s stake in a restaurant and some Aeroplan points for $375,000. However, Mr. Brown had cancelled the asset sale five weeks earlier, the report found.

Story continues below advertisement

Justice Wake called Mr. Brown’s arrangements “Byzantine in nature and disturbing on many levels.”

Providing misleading information in a mortgage application is a serious matter, experts say. If lenders discover they were misled after a sale closes, they have the right to “call in” the loan, meaning it would be immediately payable. Mortgage specialists and lenders scrutinize the source of borrowers’ down payments because of anti-money laundering laws. In the case of asset sales, they often require a paper trail, including documents from lawyers and cancelled cheques.

“We have to verify each and every source of every penny of down payment,” said Joe Sammut, a broker at Toronto-based Mortgage Architects.

Carlos Naldinho, a PC Party member, has lodged a formal complaint with the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC). “I would like them to find out where this money actually came from,” said Mr. Naldinho, founder of a protest movement in response to several nomination races that ended in controversy under Mr. Brown’s leadership.

Both large transactions exceeding $10,000 and any suspicious transactions must be reported to Canada’s financial intelligence agency, which monitors money laundering. A spokeswoman for FINTRAC declined to comment.

Mr. Brown did not reply to phone messages and e-mails. On Twitter last month, he apologized for what he called a “temporary secondary mortgage.”

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter