Skip to main content

Concerns raised by the family of an Indigenous teen who died in northern Ontario more than four decades ago have prompted the province’s police force to take a fresh look at the case, the lead investigator said Thursday.

The death of 19-year-old Audrey Anderson had been ruled an accident in 1972 when her body was found by the side of a road in Sioux Lookout, Ont.

Audrey Anderson, left, who died in 1972, is shown with her younger sister in a handout photo provided by the Sioux Lookout RCMP.

The Canadian Press

But when her family members raised her case relatively recently with a federally funded office meant to gather information on missing or murdered Indigenous women, the matter was back on the police radar.

Story continues below advertisement

Ontario Provincial Police Det. Insp. Gilles Depratto said numerous unspecified “inconsistencies” have emerged, prompting law enforcement and medical officials to take a more detailed and skeptical look at the circumstances around Ms. Anderson’s death.

“We’re looking at it with a view that this young lady died at this location and not all the information fits, so we’re having a second look at it,” the officer said in a telephone interview.

Ms. Anderson, who hailed from a rural area east of Sioux Lookout, was last seen on Oct. 11, 1972, at a local restaurant, Mr. Depratto said. While she worked a number of jobs in the area, she was at the business that night solely as a patron, he said.

Mr. Depratto said the investigation at the time revealed Ms. Anderson was last seen leaving the restaurant at around 1:30 a.m. in a pickup truck with two men. Her injured body was found lying on the shoulder of a road hours later.

The coroner’s office of the day ruled that Ms. Anderson died as the result of a motor-vehicle accident and did not treat the death as suspicious, Mr. Depratto said.

One of the men seen leaving the restaurant that day was initially charged with failing to remain at the scene of an accident, but never stood trial after the charge was dismissed due to lack of evidence, Mr. Depratto said.

Ms. Anderson’s death went unchallenged for decades, but her family continued to have many unanswered questions, Mr. Depratto said.

Story continues below advertisement

When the federal government established Family Information Liaison Units across the country two years ago, which were specifically designed to help Indigenous families gain information about female loved ones who may have been killed or gone missing, Ms. Anderson’s relatives came forward.

Mr. Depratto said the unit then asked provincial police to re-examine their files, adding that it wasn’t long before officers grew skeptical of previous findings.

“The injuries were very traumatic,” he said. “And when we started looking at the scene, the location of where this accident could have occurred, and inconsistent statements, we started following up a bit more.”

Ontario Chief Coroner Dr. Dirk Huyer re-examined his office’s 1972 ruling in the case and officially reclassified Ms. Anderson’s death, Mr. Depratto said, adding it’s now viewed as “undetermined.”

Mr. Depratto said police are still seeking answers as to what happened to Ms. Anderson, and are appealing to members of the public for answers.

“Sometimes on these cold files, people will have changed their relationships with the parties involved and they’re more forthcoming,” he said. “We’re hoping that that works this way.”

Story continues below advertisement

Anyone with information about Ms. Anderson’s death is encouraged to call an OPP tip line at: 1-807-738-5296.

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter