Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Iain Stewart in 2016, shortly after he took over as president of the National Research Council.

Blair Gable/The Globe and Mail

The incoming president of the Public Health Agency of Canada faces a daunting task in the months ahead, trying to quell the frustrations of scientists within the department, while also bracing the country for a second pandemic wave.

On Monday, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau named former National Research Council head Iain Stewart the new president of Public Health. The move follows the sudden resignation of agency president Tina Namiesniowski on Friday.

Public Health has been beset by problems in recent months surrounding key aspects of its response to COVID-19, including weaknesses in its intelligence-gathering and decision-making capacity, which critics have said led the government to underestimate the threat of the virus.

Story continues below advertisement

Doctors and epidemiologists inside the agency have told The Globe and Mail they struggled to get urgent and critical messages up the chain of command in the early days of the outbreak. Complex information often had to be “oversimplified” or “dumbed down” for senior officials who lacked a background in public health, said one scientist in an interview.

By appointing Mr. Stewart to run the agency, the government appears to be attempting to strike a balance between a president who has worked with scientists before, and an administrator to run the department, with an eye to quelling some of that criticism.

When he took the reins of the NRC in 2016, Mr. Stewart was tasked with reinvigorating the government’s billion-dollar research division and addressing concerns among researchers that it had lost its way. Mr. Stewart told The Globe at the time that his job involved rebuilding morale among scientists who had grown concerned about the strategic direction.

He will face a similar challenge in his new role. Though Mr. Stewart does not come to the job with a background in public health, the government is hoping he will be seen as someone who can work closely with scientists and experts, and who will listen. Perhaps more importantly, NRC and Public Health have partnered on projects in the past, including the build-out of Canada’s pandemic early warning and surveillance unit.

The unit, known as the Global Public Health Intelligence Network, or GPHIN, has been at the centre of controversy since a Globe and Mail investigation in late July revealed that senior Public Health officials cut back much of its outbreak detection and surveillance capacity in late 2018 and early 2019, less than a year before the pandemic hit.

Amid shifting government priorities, analysts within the highly specialized unit were reassigned to other work that didn’t involve pandemic readiness – a decision they blamed on civil servants failing to grasp the fundamentals of public health. This curtailment of GPHIN’s operations is said to have contributed to a series of botched risk assessments of the virus by the federal government. Throughout January, February and much of March, Canada’s official risk assessments labelled the outbreak as a “Low” threat to the country, even as it spread aggressively around the world and new evidence emerged that human-to-human transmission was a major problem.

When the World Health Organization declared the virus a high risk to the world in late January, and warned countries to begin preparing, Canada continued to state the risk level was low for another month and a half. That miscalculation is said to have delayed key responses, such as locking down long-term care homes, where Canada has had the bulk of its fatalities from COVID-19, and stockpiling personal protective equipment for hospitals, among other crucial mitigation efforts.

Story continues below advertisement

Canada’s Auditor-General is now probing the agency’s oversight of GPHIN and Health Minister Patty Hajdu has ordered an independent federal investigation into the matter.

Ms. Namiesniowski said in an e-mail to staff that she was stepping down to take a break from the rigours of the job. The fact that a new president was named so soon after her sudden departure suggests the government had a replacement in mind when her resignation was announced.

Amid the problems at the agency, Public Health has seen two senior managers depart in recent weeks. In addition to Ms. Namiesniowski’s resignation, the government said vice-president Sally Thornton retired this month. Ms. Thornton oversaw GPHIN, including a decision that silenced its pandemic alerting capacity last year, as well as the national emergency stockpile of protective equipment, which was unable to meet surging demand in the early months of the outbreak.

Current and former scientists have told The Globe the agency needs senior officials to have a better understanding of public health within its administrative ranks in order to deal with a crisis such as COVID-19. Neither Ms. Namiesniowski, who has a background in political science and previously worked at the Border Services Agency, nor Ms. Thornton, a lawyer who served in the Treasury Board, had a background in public health before being appointed to key roles.

Mr. Stewart, who has a master’s degree in public administration, served as assistant vice-president of research at Dalhousie University in 2009 and 2010. His career has mostly involved stints at Industry Canada, including one as deputy minister of science and innovation in 2008-09.

In 2016, Dalhousie University’s then-vice-president of research, Monica Crago, described Mr. Stewart in an interview as a person with "a genuine curiosity and respect for research and science.”

Story continues below advertisement

As PHAC president, he must now navigate an agency where scientists have felt marginalized, while also overseeing the administrative demands of the agency.

The Chief Public Health Officer (CPHO) is the face of the agency, and current chief Dr. Theresa Tam is often the one speaking directly to Canadians. But structural and strategic decisions for the department, which have the greatest influence over how it operates, are made by the president.

Public Health was led for years by the CPHO alone, after the agency was formed as an independent voice inside government in the wake of the 2003 SARS outbreak. However, the agency has undergone significant change over the years, including a move by the Conservative government in 2014 to alter the Public Health Act, which created the president’s role.

That shifted the power balance away from the CPHO, who is a public-health doctor, and put it in the hands of a senior official appointed by government. The Conservatives said the move was done to lessen the CPHO’s workload, but the Liberals warned it would hurt the agency over time. However, when the government changed in 2015, the structure remained intact.

With files from Ivan Semeniuk

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies