Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Public Safety Minister Bill Blair faced harsh questions Wednesday over security related to the federal quarantine program after reports of two incidents of alleged sexual assault.

At a parliamentary committee hearing, Conservative MP Shannon Stubbs grilled Blair over safeguards for guests at federally approved quarantine hotels.

She also questioned him about background checks for screening officers who work at the hotels and conduct compliance checks at homes of Canadians quarantined due to COVID-19.

Story continues below advertisement

Blair told the committee that quarantine measures have been effective and that any allegations should be thoroughly investigated.

He diverted questions on the hotel quarantine program to the Public Health Agency of Canada that oversees it, saying he has no jurisdiction over the file and that Stubbs is “simply misinformed” on his role.

“Thank you for the condescension,” Stubbs replied.

“I do expect though that almost every single Canadian would hope that the minister of public safety of this country would ... ensure that Canadians are safe and secure within facilities or at home trying to comply with rules that the federal government has set.”

A government order that took effect Feb. 22 requires all non-essential travellers entering Canada by air to stay at a federally approved hotel for up to three nights at the start of a 14-day quarantine.

Police have arrested two men accused of sexual assault related to quarantine measures, one at a Montreal hotel and another tied to a compliance check in Oakville, Ont.

The latter case involved a quarantine screening officer who allegedly demanded cash from a woman before sexually assaulting her at her home, and who now faces related charges, Halton regional police said last month.

Story continues below advertisement

The accused had been trained by the Public Health Agency of Canada as a designated screening officer under the Quarantine Act, police said.

Trained screening officers working for four security companies under contract with the agency began in-person compliance visits on Jan. 29 in Montreal and Toronto, it said.

At the public safety committee hearing Wednesday evening, Stubbs asked Blair whether the government carries out security checks on screening officers beyond any done by their employers.

“Operators have been telling single women not to tell people of their location and to leave their doors unlocked, and that in some cases there are no locks on the doors within those quarantine facilities at all,” Stubbs said.

“Where there’s an allegation, that has to be thoroughly investigated,” Blair said.

“The operation of the designated quarantine facilities is entirely under the authority of the Public Health Agency of Canada. I actually have no jurisdiction over those matters,” he stated, adding that the RCMP plays a supporting role.

Story continues below advertisement

The government’s quarantine measures have hit turbulence outside of alleged criminal incidents.

The hiccups range from reports of 10-hour phone waits to book rooms to overcrowded hotels with delayed meal service and dietary restrictions for some guests going unmet.

Travellers pay up to $2,000 for the accommodations and can leave once a COVID-19 test taken at the airport comes back negative, though no discount attends a shorter stay.

Conservative health critic Michelle Rempel Garner repeatedly asked Health Minister Patty Hajdu on Wednesday whether the government has data showing that hotel quarantines are more effective in preventing spread of COVID-19 variants than at-home isolation coupled with pre- and post-arrival testing.

Hajdu avoided answering the question directly, prompting a back-and-forth that culminated in Liberal MP Angelo Iacono accusing Rempel Garner of acting like “a bit of a bully.”

“I would argue that the woman who experienced sexual assault at the quarantine hotel due to this lack of data would in fact be the woman who would have experienced bullying,” Rempel Garner replied.

Story continues below advertisement

Hajdu told the committee that Ottawa opted for the quarantine hotels “to make sure that people have a safe place to stay” while they receive results from tests taken at the airport.

A constitutional rights advocacy group announced this week it is mounting a legal challenge to Ottawa’s hotel quarantine policy, arguing it infringes on Canadians’ fundamental rights.

The Canadian Constitution Foundation has filed an application with Ontario’s Superior Court of Justice along with five individuals, seeking an end to the policy. The application names the Attorney General of Canada as the defendant.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies