Skip to main content

Newfoundland and Labrador has achieved a rare win in its long-standing battle with Hydro-Québec over a 50-year-old agreement on sales of power from the Churchill Falls generating station.

A Quebec Court of Appeal decision Thursday ruled that Churchill Falls Corp. Ltd. – a subsidiary of Newfoundland’s Crown corporation overseeing hydroelectricity – has the right to sell energy produced above a certain threshold.

“Hydro-Québec does not have the exclusive right to purchase, and receive, all of the energy produced by the Upper Churchill power plant,” Justice Jacques Chamberland wrote, reversing a trial court ruling from 2016.

Story continues below advertisement

Hydro-Québec utility retains the right to sell Churchill Falls energy up to an annual cap.

The decision is the latest round in a battle that reached the Supreme Court of Canada, which ruled last year that Hydro-Québec had no obligation to modify its 1969 deal with the Atlantic province.

Under the agreement, which is valid until 2041, Hydro-Québec can purchase the majority of electricity from the central Labrador facility. The utility had argued successfully the deal was valid because it had assumed all the costs and risks that came with the project when the contract was signed.

Quebec premier Legault aims to boost use of hydroelectric power

Legault Year One: How the CAQ has transformed Quebec so far

Newfoundland’s reckoning: Will the province crumble under its debt load?

Thursday’s decision concerns how a contract that has been highly profitable for Hydro-Québec should be interpreted since September 2016, rather than whether it should be renegotiated.

“Hydro-Québec is satisfied with the fact that the Quebec Court of Appeal confirms it’s right to operational flexibility stated in the 1969 contract and rejects the notion of monthly caps,” spokesman Cendrix Bouchard.

The utility said it is analyzing the decision before deciding whether to file an appeal.

Churchill Falls Corp. president Stan Marshall said in a statement the company is “pleased” with the ruling.

Story continues below advertisement

“I’m very relieved, I will say,” Newfoundland Premier Dwight Ball added. “It’s good news for the province.”

Mr. Ball told reporters it was a tough decision to go through the effort of appeal in 2016, “but we had to, it was no choice.”

He said the ruling removes question marks around water management and the Muskrat Falls project.

With files from Holly McKenzie-Sutter in St. John’s.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies