Skip to main content

Tom Cardoso and Dakshana Bascaramurty will take reader questions and discuss The Globe investigation that found risk...

Posted by The Globe and Mail on Monday, October 26, 2020

Risk assessments are meant to be an impartial guide of who can be rehabilitated and how soon, but racialized inmates routinely get the worst possible scores. They’re steeped in decades of research – and they are also fundamentally, powerfully biased against Indigenous and Black inmates, placing them in higher security classifications and assigning them worse odds of successfully re-entering society.

Indigenous and Black inmates don’t get an equal chance in federal prisons' standard tests, Globe analysis finds

How The Globe uncovered systemic bias in prisoners' risk assessments

A years-long investigation by The Globe and Mail found:
  • Black men are nearly 24-per-cent more likely than white men to receive a “maximum” initial security rating, the worst possible score;
  • Indigenous men are roughly 30-per-cent more likely than their white counterparts to be assigned the worst possible reintegration-potential score.

Tom Cardoso and Dakshana Bascaramurty will answer reader questions about the investigation


Story continues below advertisement

Moderated by Dakshana Bascaramurty.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the authors of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Comments are closed

We have closed comments on this story for legal reasons or for abuse. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies