Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }

In its decision today, the Supreme Court of Canada says the Crown, not the surveyors, control copyright related to the plans.

Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press

A Supreme Court of Canada decision has put the brakes on a long-planned class-action suit over the rights to property surveys in Ontario.

Keatley Surveying Ltd. brought the action 12 years ago on behalf of Ontario companies that deposited plans of survey in provincial land-registry offices.

In 1991, the Ontario government and Teranet Inc., a for-profit company, began work on an electronic land-registration and administration system.

Story continues below advertisement

Keatley argued that Teranet, operator of the land-registry database on behalf of the province, infringed surveyors’ copyright by digitizing, storing and copying the plans of survey.

When plans are deposited at a registry office, Teranet scans the documents and adds them to its database. It makes the digitized documents available through two service portals for a fee.

Copies of such plans filed with registry offices have long been available to members of the public for a fee, and the land surveyor who prepares the document has never received a portion of the money.

An Ontario judge dismissed the class action, finding that copyright concerning the plans of survey had been transferred to the province.

Keatley unsuccessfully challenged the decision in the Ontario Court of Appeal, prompting the company to take the case to the Supreme Court.

In its decision Thursday, the high court upheld the lower-court decisions, saying the Crown, not the surveyors, controls copyright related to the plans.

The seven justices who heard the case all agreed that Keatley’s appeal should be dismissed, although they provided two sets of reasons.

Story continues below advertisement

The decision is the first time the Supreme Court has reviewed the scope of the nearly century-old Section 12 of the federal Copyright Act. The section vests copyright in the Crown for any work prepared or published by, or under the direction or control of, a government agency.

Justice Rosalie Abella, writing on behalf of three others, said in this case the Crown has copyright because it directs and controls every aspect of publication of the deposited plans of survey. When Teranet makes the works available through the digital portals Teraview or GeoWarehouse, this publication is done under the Crown’s direction, she said.

“While the S. 12 test is a stringent one, it is readily met on the facts of this case,” Justice Abella wrote.

The plans of survey in the registry are meant to be used by the public to determine property rights and obligations, she added.

“It is for this very reason that the Crown decided to create a single, authoritative registry. These are precisely the types of works over which Crown copyright should subsist – those over which it is necessary for the Crown to guarantee authenticity, accuracy and integrity in the public interest.”

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Follow related topics

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies