Skip to main content
// //

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau responds to a question during a news conference, Oct. 9, 2020 in Ottawa.

Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau acknowledged problems at the Public Health Agency on Tuesday, after two top doctors criticized an erosion of funding and scientific capacity for hindering its ability to confront a pandemic.

Mr. Trudeau put much of the blame for the problems on the previous government, saying structural changes and funding cuts implemented by the Conservatives prior to 2015 are at the heart of the matter.

“We all knew that under the previous Conservative government there were massive cuts to science, there was marginalization of scientific voices, there was a putting-aside of experts in an attempt to cut the budget, cut the deficit at all costs, on the backs of Canadians,” Mr. Trudeau said.

Story continues below advertisement

The government has made considerable investments in science since then, he said.

However, doctors and epidemiologists inside Public Health say the problems were never fixed. Even though the Liberals opposed the Conservatives’ moves at the time – such as the creation of a government-appointed president to run the agency – they say the Trudeau government allowed them to persist. These include an influx of senior government officials from other departments who lack a sufficient understanding of public health.

The department has been beset by problems in recent months, including a controversy over the mishandling of the country’s pandemic early warning system, shortages in the emergency stockpile and allegations that scientists had to “dumb down” reports for senior managers.

A Globe and Mail investigation in July reported that the country’s pandemic surveillance system, a highly specialized unit known as the Global Public Health Intelligence Network, or GPHIN, was effectively silenced in 2019. That ill-timed decision came as the department, having not faced an outbreak threat in several years, sought to reallocate GPHIN’s resources for other projects that didn’t involve pandemic preparedness.

Such problems are symptomatic of a larger ailment at the agency, public-health experts say.

This week, two top doctors spoke out about what they saw as persistent underfunding of the agency, and an erosion of scientific capacity within its ranks. The government was warned years ago that Public Health was destined for problems if certain structural matters were not addressed, they said.

Perry Kendall, who preceded Bonnie Henry as B.C.'s provincial health officer from 1999 to 2018, and Paul Gully, who filled senior roles at Health Canada for 14 years and was a former deputy chief public-health officer, called on the government to address the structural problems.

Story continues below advertisement

“We are of the view that long-term deficiencies of expertise and funding prevent the Public Health Agency of Canada from fully carrying out its intended and necessary role,” said Dr. Kendall, who warned of such problems during federal hearings in 2014.

The decision to give control of budgets and program planning to the president, a government appointee with no background in public health, leaves the department prone to short-term thinking, Dr. Kendall said. This is a particular risk between major outbreaks, when there are no immediate threats and the temptation to move funds elsewhere is heightened, or the agency’s mandate is expanded into new areas. The "short-sighted” handling of the pandemic intelligence system is just one example, Dr. Kendall said.

Their comments echo those of another respected voice in public health, former chief public-health officer David Butler-Jones, who warned this year that the agency had, over time, “replaced public-health managers and analysts with generic public servants.” As a result, “Resources, expertise, and capacity have been reduced, and expertise positioned further away from where organizational decisions are made.”

Mr. Trudeau said Tuesday his government has boosted funding for science, but did not specify if money was directed at bolstering the agency’s scientific capacity. Since the beginning of the pandemic, Ottawa has made funds available for vaccine research, personal protective equipment and other COVID-19 response initiatives involving companies and organizations across Canada.

“We made historic investments in science, we’ve worked to restore many of the cuts made to our institutions over 10 long years,” Mr. Trudeau said. “We will continue to work with our scientists and our experts every step of the way.”

Dr. Gully and Dr. Kendall said this week the agency should be given a “comprehensive examination of federal public-health capacity.” That includes a look at how Public Health is funded, and whether the president’s role – as currently structured – is in the best interests of the country.

Story continues below advertisement

Public Health was created after the 2003 SARS crisis to be an independent scientific voice within government. Dr. Gully said they hope the agency “will be adequately resourced and empowered to return to its former pre-eminence as a trusted source of independent advice, scientific knowledge, and national and global leadership."

Since The Globe’s investigation was published, management at the department has been shuffled. Agency president Tina Namiesniowski resigned suddenly last month after the problems came to light, while another vice-president responsible for GPHIN retired. The Auditor-General has also announced a probe into the problems, while the Health Minister has ordered an independent federal review into the matter.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Coronavirus information
Coronavirus information
The Zero Canada Project provides resources to help you manage your health, your finances and your family life as Canada reopens.
Visit the hub
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies