Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

The exterior of Ludlow Hall is seen at the University of New Brunswick, in Fredericton, on Oct. 30, 2019.

Kevin Bissett/The Canadian Press

The board of governors at the University of New Brunswick voted Tuesday to strip George Duncan Ludlow’s name from the school’s law faculty building in Fredericton because of his connections to slavery and the abuse of Indigenous people.

Crews removed the name within 30 minutes of the vote, which also recommended installing a permanent display that explores Ludlow’s history and explain why his name was removed from the building.

Ludlow was a loyalist from New York who became New Brunswick’s first chief justice in the 1780s, and he was also one of the last judges in the British empire to uphold the legality of slavery.

Story continues below advertisement

He was also a member of the board of directors for the Sussex Vale Indian Day School, which contracted out First Nations children as indentured servants.

The UNB Student Union and the Law Students’ Society both pressured the school to have Ludlow’s name removed.

The student union also sought to have the name removed from all maps and university literature, and lobbied for a plaque to be created to contextualize Ludlow’s place in New Brunswick’s history.

UNB president Paul Mazerolle said a working group that studied the issue has recommended holding an educational event or events to share what was learned through its review and encourage further study of African-Canadian and Indigenous history in New Brunswick.

“Obviously lots of people won’t agree with this decision and lots of people are heartened by this decision,” Mazerolle said Tuesday. “Maybe in time more and more people will understand and respect the decision we’ve made.”

In its 40-page report, the working group said it heard from people who wanted the name removed, along with a “smaller number” who supported keeping it.

“Notably, several current law students expressed feelings of shame, embarrassment and re-victimization when entering the Faculty of Law with Ludlow’s name prominently displayed above the main entrance,” the report states.

Story continues below advertisement

“Some were against removing or changing names and some feel a sentimental attachment to the name, without connecting it to the man himself.”

The report said no documentation could be found in the archives indicating that the president at the time of the naming, Colin B. MacKay, had been told about Ludlow’s association with slavery or the Sussex Vale school. However, Karl Dore, then assistant professor and later dean of law, wrote to the working group to say he raised the concerns with MacKay in 1968 before the opening of the building.

The report also contains written submissions made to the working group that demonstrate strong emotions on both sides of the issue.

“The thought of renaming Ludlow Hall is repulsive,” wrote one person, while another wrote to say they are embarrassed to have the name Ludlow associated with the school. “As far as I am concerned, his association with the school should have already been removed.”

Another said there will be scrutiny of whatever name is chosen as a replacement: “What happens in 50 years when the new namesake is discovered to have done things that are against the current day’s standards?”

Others expressed concerns that efforts are being made to rewrite history and said the issue should be explained without removing the name.

Story continues below advertisement

Mazerolle said the university is not trying to erase history, which is why a plaque with Ludlow’s biography and the reasons for removing the name will be in place permanently.

He said a new name will be chosen before the end of the year.

Mazerolle said the working group will now review the process for naming places at both the Fredericton and Saint John campuses. Another report is to be completed by December 1.

The issue at UNB is just the latest example of efforts to remove colonial names and symbols from public spaces in Canada.

Two years ago, the City of Halifax removed a statue of Edward Cornwallis, who founded the city in 1749, over his proclamation offering a bounty to anyone to killed a Mi’kmaq person.

Also in 2018, a statue of Sir John A. Macdonald, Canada’s first prime minister, was removed from the steps in front of Victoria City Hall because of Macdonald’s role in creating the residential school system.

Story continues below advertisement

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies