Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

The panel appointment comes just days after a civilian court ordered the U.S. government to respond to Omar Khadr’s latest plea to have his appeal heard.

JASON FRANSON/The Canadian Press

A U.S. military court has appointed three judges to hear Omar Khadr appeal his war-crimes convictions, signalling a possible end to a years-long delay in the Canadian’s quest to clear his name.

The panel appointment comes just days after a civilian court ordered the U.S. government to respond to Mr. Khadr’s latest plea to have his appeal heard.

Sam Morison, Mr. Khadr’s American lawyer, said the Department of Defence has opposed having Mr. Khadr’s case decided because it considers him a fugitive.

Story continues below advertisement

“It’s just irrational. How can Khadr be a fugitive? They transferred him to Canada,” Mr. Morison said on Wednesday from Virginia. “They know that their case is vulnerable [and] they’re trying any way they can to avoid having to confront the merits of his appeal”

Since the Americans returned him to Canada in September, 2012, the Toronto-born Mr. Khadr has been trying to clear his name. He filed an appeal of his convictions in November, 2013.

American soldiers had captured Mr. Khadr as a badly wounded 15-year-old following a firefight in Afghanistan in July, 2002, in which a U.S. special forces soldier was killed. He was moved to the notorious U.S. military facility at Guantanamo Bay within months.

In October, 2010, Mr. Khadr pleaded guilty to five purported war crimes before a widely maligned U.S. military commission and was sentenced to eight more years in prison. He later said he pleaded guilty as his only way out of Guantanamo Bay.

Mr. Khadr’s appeal argument – with some support from U.S. courts – is that the commission convicted him of offences that weren’t crimes at the time he allegedly committed them. However, the U.S. Court of Military Commission Review that sits as a first appeal forum for commission verdicts has steadfastly refused to hear his case.

That precludes Mr. Khadr, who turned 33 last week, from taking his fight to a civilian appellate court where normal rules of evidence apply.

Last month, Mr. Khadr petitioned the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to force the military review court known as CMCR to hear his appeal.

Story continues below advertisement

“The CMCR has obdurately failed to exercise its affirmative statutory obligation to review the validity of his conviction,” Mr. Morison states in the petition. “After nearly six years, the CMCR’s continued foot-dragging amounts to little more than a pocket veto of Khadr’s right to direct review, and this court’s appellate jurisdiction.”

On Friday, the D.C. Circuit Court gave the U.S. government 30 days to respond. However, the Court of Military Commission Review issued a terse order on Tuesday appointing William Pollard as presiding judge to hear the case along with Chief Justice Paulette Burton and Justice Jan Aldykiewicz.

The review court did not respond to a request for comment and it remained unclear when Mr. Khadr might finally get a hearing.

Mr. Khadr became a political flashpoint in July, 2017, when the Canadian government paid him $10.5-million for violating his rights. The Supreme Court of Canada had previously ruled the government had failed him during his detention in Guantanamo Bay.

However, he remains a convicted war criminal. His conviction looms large in a civil suit by the widow of the American special-forces soldier Mr. Khadr is alleged to have killed in Afghanistan and a former soldier blinded in that battle. A court in Utah awarded them US$134-million based on Mr. Khadr’s military commission confession and conviction. Their attempt to enforce the award in Canada is scheduled to continue in November.

Mr. Khadr has married and lives in Edmonton without restrictions. An Alberta court had ordered him released on bail in April, 2015, pending disposition of his appeal in the U.S. but earlier this year, the court ruled he had served his sentence and released him unconditionally.

Story continues below advertisement

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to
Comments are closed

We have closed comments on this story for legal reasons or for abuse. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies