Skip to main content
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Any changes to Canada’s laws on pollution and toxic chemicals will likely not be made until after the next federal election.

Environment Minister Catherine McKenna responded Friday to 87 recommendations made by the House of Commons environment committee a year ago on how to overhaul the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, which governs the protection of human and environmental health through things such as chemical management and air pollution strategies.

In a letter to the committee, McKenna says the government agrees with the intent of most of the recommendations, but that the legislative agenda just can’t accommodate another new bill right now.

Story continues below advertisement

She says the government is “committed to introducing a bill to reform (the act) as soon as possible in a future Parliament” and will in the meantime consult widely on exactly how to update the legislation.

That likely means there won’t be any changes to how Canada manages toxic chemicals and air pollution until after the next election, which is scheduled for October 2019.

McKenna says the government is trying to do things that don’t require legislative amendments, such as mandatory product labelling when a toxic chemical is present and considering vulnerable populations like children or pregnant women when assessing how a chemical should be managed.

However, she is not yet ready to agree to enshrine the right to a healthy environment in federal law.

The delays are irritating to opposition members on the committee and the environmental community, all of whom were hoping the government was going to act much faster.

“This is not responsible government,” said Conservative environment critic Ed Fast. “It certainly looks like they’ve been sitting on their hands and it undermines the work and the expectation of the committee members.”

Fast said he suspects the government wants to spend a year consulting and then use the issue as a campaign tool in the next federal election, scheduled for October 2019.

Story continues below advertisement

Muhannad Malas, toxics program manager at Environmental Defence, called it “very disappointing” that a year after the report, the government is only at the point of launching consultations and making nonlegislative changes. It is even more disappointing than any amendments to the act will be delayed more than a year, he said.

“We are miles behind Europe and we are miles behind some American states.”

Labels and assertions to consider vulnerable populations are all well and good, he added, but for those things to really have an impact they need to be in the act, not just an outside regulation or policy, Malas said.

The act, known as CEPA, must be reviewed every five years; the committee undertook its latest review in 2016. McKenna said last fall she would notify the committee this month what actions she intended to take.

The committee’s recommendations included amendments to give cabinet more authority to demand data and testing results on products to help assess their risk to Canadians, and that the act require all products containing hazardous substances to have mandatory warning labels.

In the year since the committee report was made public, a number of different groups have put their weight behind it. Others have pointed to new studies which could help guide the government’s response, such as national tests showing the presence of bisphenol A – a toxic chemical – in the bloodstreams of Canadians.

Story continues below advertisement

Another study found the presence of cancer-causing chemicals in baby bibs and blankets – chemicals already banned in many products, but still used in other applications, such as waterproofing and stain resistance.

In February, more than 500 doctors and scientists in Canada asked Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to amend the law to put the onus on companies to prove their products are safe for people and the environment, rather than science having to prove otherwise.

Malas called it disappointing that McKenna didn’t address that request in her response at all.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies