Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Donald MacPherson, executive director of the Canadian Drug Policy Coalition, in Vancouver, on Feb. 19, 2021.

DARRYL DYCK/The Canadian Press

Federal government proposals to relax penalties for personal drug possession are a positive step forward for Vancouver’s former drug czar, but they’re too small to address skyrocketing overdose deaths.

Donald MacPherson, director of the Canadian Drug Policy Coalition at Simon Fraser University, introduced the city’s drug strategy in the 1990s and the same principles guide the federal approach.

Today, he says that strategy isn’t enough and governments also need to adopt policy that matches the scale of the emergency.

Story continues below advertisement

“Our policy framework has created a monster, really, which is a drug market laced with illegal fentanyl and its analogues,” Mr. MacPherson said in an interview.

“It’s a terrible example of a catastrophic failure of public policy, in my mind, which urgently needs to be modernized.”

Last week, the federal government introduced a bill that would repeal mandatory minimum penalties for drug offences and some gun-related crimes that it said unfairly affect Indigenous and Black offenders.

The bill would allow for greater use of conditional sentences, such as counselling or treatment for people who do not pose a threat to public safety. It would also require police and prosecutors to consider alternative measures for cases of simple drug possession, including diversion to addiction-treatment programs.

The proposed legislation comes after British Columbia recorded 1,716 overdose deaths in 2020, the highest ever in a single year.

While a toxic drug supply has taken lives across the country, its toll has been most concentrated in B.C., making it home to some of Canada’s most vocal advocates for change.

Mr. MacPherson said there are parallels with Canada’s first severe overdose crisis in the late 1990s. It was compounded by an HIV crisis among injection drug users in B.C. and a health emergency was declared in 1997, although the death rate didn’t approach that seen today, Mr. MacPherson said.

Story continues below advertisement

“We were sort of global pariahs. What was happening in such a good country as Canada that so many people could die of overdose deaths in British Columbia?”

It has been almost 20 years since Vancouver adopted the so-called Four Pillars drug strategy that Mr. MacPherson introduced as North America’s first drug policy co-ordinator. The strategy focuses on prevention, harm reduction, treatment and enforcement. It originated in Europe and has also been used by Ottawa.

Four Pillars is an effective way to mobilize the community and co-ordinate response from three levels of government, but the missing piece is policy, Mr. MacPherson said.

There’s an urgent need to decriminalize possession, concentrate enforcement on the illicit supply of drugs, regulate recovery facilities, reduce harm through a safe pharmaceutical supply and invest in evidence-based treatment, he said.

Eliminating minimum penalties for possession is positive, but it’s an example of incremental change, such as adding 100 new treatment beds when the scale of the problem is much bigger, he added.

“My reflection when we went to study the European examples was they had a disaster on their hands too. But at the time, in the eighties, they actually mustered the strength … to respond in a way that was proportional to the problem,” he said.

Story continues below advertisement

At the same time that B.C. has suffered the worst of the crisis, it’s also positioned to be the seed of change, he said. Mr. MacPherson said he’s hopeful Ottawa will entertain requests from Vancouver Mayor Kennedy Stewart and Premier John Horgan for exemptions that would allow decriminalization locally.

“We can’t expect the same old same old to get us out of this,” Mr. MacPherson said.

Leslie McBain of Moms Stop the Harm said the most troubling part of the federal government’s approach on drug offence penalties would be the discretion it leaves to police and judges over charges and consequences.

“Are police and judges skilled enough and knowledgeable enough in addiction?” asked Ms. McBain, who is based in B.C. and has been a long-time advocate of drug policy change.

Ms. McBain said she worries that discretionary power could see people with a health problem funnelled into the criminal justice system unnecessarily, increasing the harm they may face as well as the stigmatization.

“It also drives people into the shadows with their drug use, especially marginalized people,” she said.

Story continues below advertisement

The Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police said its members are pleased the proposed legislation supports police discretion and the notion that resources should target organized crime groups and individuals who import, produce or distribute illegal drugs.

But for diversionary tactics to be effective, health and social services must be available for drug users to be diverted, the association said in a statement.

“As a result, the enactment of this bill must be accompanied by significant investments at all government levels to support the creation and ongoing operations of an infrastructure of services in communities across the country,” it said.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies