Skip to main content
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

An agreement that commits two levels of government to end current and future homeless encampments in British Columbia’s capital city is a potential blueprint for similar deals, says the province’s minister responsible for housing.

The memorandum of understanding between the provincial government and Victoria council formalizes the commitment to find indoor shelter for people living in parks and other outdoor areas, David Eby said Monday.

The agreement sets out roles and responsibilities of each government to find indoor living spaces by April 30 for those camped out in public areas, he said.

Story continues below advertisement

“I think this agreement is a template that I am hoping to replicate in other places,” Mr. Eby said during a news conference.

While the deal in Victoria was forged out of crisis, Mr. Eby said he’s hopeful similar agreements will become common in other cities.

Victoria council voted last week to reinstate a bylaw that requires people camping in parks to pack their belongings by 7 a.m. after it eased restrictions last year because the COVID-19 pandemic forced shelters to reduce available beds.

Victoria’s Beacon Hill Park has been the site of a camp of homeless people that has grown during the pandemic, bringing with it crime and community resentment.

“We’re going to move people out of parks,” Victoria Mayor Lisa Helps said. “We’re not going to let encampments happen again.”

She said the agreement is a shared commitment by the city and province to work together to end homeless camps by April 30 and continue that work until people are properly housed.

“That’s a big commitment by the province. It’s a big commitment by the city and we signed this memorandum of understanding to say we’re going to do it,” Ms. Helps said.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Eby announced an agreement earlier this month on securing more than 200 living spaces for people staying in Victoria’s parks and other outdoor locations.

The understanding signed on Monday says the objective is the shared commitment “to prevent future camps by addressing medium- and long-term housing, health, mental health, cultural and social support needs.”

Mr. Eby said the province has found indoor shelter space in buildings and other sites that are currently being converted to house people on a temporary basis.

He said people living in parks are being told they will have indoor shelter space as of April 30.

“It will also be made clear that they are not able to camp in parks the way they have been,” Mr. Eby said. “We have spaces inside. Parks are for recreation, not camping.”

The minister acknowledged that while he has reached one agreement, he still faces a dispute with the Okanagan city of Penticton, where the council says it will not renew a permit beyond March 31 to allow a shelter to operate.

Story continues below advertisement

“My door remains open for Penticton on how to move forward,” Mr. Eby said. “I can’t bear and won’t sign off on a proposal that involves emptying out a homeless shelter into the local community.”

Penticton will hold a special meeting of council on Tuesday that is closed to the public and media to discuss the latest correspondence from BC Housing on the shelter issue.

We have a weekly Western Canada newsletter written by our B.C. and Alberta bureau chiefs, providing a comprehensive package of the news you need to know about the region and its place in the issues facing Canada. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies