Skip to main content

A salmon fish farm located in the waters just off the northern end of Vancouver Island.

Rick Collins/The Globe and Mail

The B.C. government is poised to give an effective veto to First Nations over fish farm tenures in their territories, a historic concession that reaches beyond the traditional court-ordered requirement that Indigenous groups be consulted and accommodated on resource decisions on their lands.

The NDP government will announce on Wednesday B.C.’s aquaculture industry will have four years to adapt before any tenures are cancelled, sources told The Globe and Mail. The veto power most assuredly means that some companies will be evicted because the farms are adamantly opposed by some – but not all – Indigenous groups.

Agriculture Minister Lana Popham, along with the premier’s deputy minister Don Wright, outlined their new policy this week in private briefings with stakeholders. The announcement Wednesday is timed to coincide with the expiry of 20 B.C.-issued seabed tenures in the province’s most hotly contested region for aquaculture – the Broughton Archipelago.

Story continues below advertisement

Sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity, told The Globe that those tenures will be maintained on a month-to-month basis until June 30, 2022, when the new rules will apply across the coast.

There are currently 116 marine finfish farms operating in British Columbia, and most of the regulation of the industry falls under the federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). The majority of the DFO-issued tenures expire in 2022. But B.C. controls the seabed, and through that narrow authority, it has the power to influence where open-net pens are located.

british columbia salmon farms

Licenses and tenures, as of March 2014

Port Hardy

BRITISH COLUMBIA

Vancouver

Island

Powell

River

Campbell

River

Squamish

Pacific Ocean

Courtenay

Vancouver

Central Coast

Nanaimo

Klemtu

Ocean

Falls

Duncan

Open net cage

Bella Bella

Victoria

Closed containment

JOHN SOPINSKI/THE GLOBE AND MAIL, SOURCE: living

oceans (data via gov’t of british columbia and the

dept. of fisheries and oceans canada; google maps

british columbia salmon farms

Licenses and tenures, as of March 2014

Port Hardy

BRITISH COLUMBIA

Vancouver

Island

Powell

River

Campbell

River

Squamish

Pacific Ocean

Courtenay

Central Coast

Vancouver

Nanaimo

Klemtu

Duncan

Ocean

Falls

Open net cage

Bella Bella

Victoria

Closed containment

JOHN SOPINSKI/THE GLOBE AND MAIL, SOURCE: living

oceans (data via gov’t of british columbia and the

dept. of fisheries and oceans canada; google maps

british columbia salmon farms

Licenses and tenures, as of March 2014

Port

Hardy

BRITISH COLUMBIA

Vancouver

Island

Powell

River

Campbell

River

Squamish

Pacific Ocean

Courtenay

Vancouver

Central Coast

Nanaimo

Klemtu

Ocean

Falls

Duncan

Open net cage

Bella Bella

Closed

containment

Victoria

JOHN SOPINSKI/THE GLOBE AND MAIL, SOURCE: living oceans (data via gov’t of

british columbia and the dept. of fisheries and oceans canada; google maps

Premier John Horgan promised to determine the fate of the tenures issued by the province through a “consent-based” policy, which has been developed with Indigenous communities in the Broughton Archipelago over the past six months.

That commitment was guided by the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), which calls on governments to obtain free, prior and informed consent for resource development from the local Indigenous people.

The resulting framework, the sources said, will mean that open-net aquaculture operations will require the consent of local First Nations before B.C. renews their tenures. In the Broughton Archipelago, that will be interpreted as a pending eviction notice.

In addition, the province will require the federal DFO to confirm that the fish farms will not threaten wild salmon stocks.

In a statement provided Tuesday, DFO officials said Ottawa will respect the provincial government’s decision regarding the issue of tenures for existing aquaculture sites in the Broughton Archipelago.

Story continues below advertisement

It is unclear just how the DFO will be able to provide assurances that fish farms will not threaten wild salmon, however. The B.C. government says it has concerns about how Ottawa regulates fish farms in its waters, but there is scientific debate about whether farms are responsible for the decline in wild salmon stocks.

The B.C. government last week announced a new expert panel to help shape policies to protect wild salmon, an iconic – and declining – species of the West Coast. Last December, the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada called for new protection for Fraser River sockeye under the federal Species at Risk Act.

A number of factors have been identified for the decline in some of the province’s most important runs, including overfishing, pollution and rising water temperature due to climate change. Others suggest fish farming along the sockeye’s maritime migration routes may be transmitting diseases that impact wild fish.

In 2012, then-B.C. Supreme Court justice Bruce Cohen completed a $35-million inquiry into the collapse of sockeye stocks in the Fraser River. Thirteen of the commission’s 75 recommendations related to aquaculture, and the DFO is still working on scientific studies to fill knowledge gaps that were identified – including research investigating the impacts of pathogens from fish farms on migrating wild Pacific salmon.

B.C. is one of the largest producers of farmed Atlantic salmon in the world, and in recent years, farmed salmon eclipsed the province’s commercial wild salmon harvest in economic value. The farm-gate value of B.C.’s total aquaculture industry was $776.8-million in 2016.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter