Skip to main content
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

A aerial view shows the debris going into Quesnel Lake caused by a tailings pond breach near the town of Likely, B.C., on Aug., 5, 2014.

JONATHAN HAYWARD/The Canadian Press

Seven years after a catastrophic dam failure at the Mount Polley mine in British Columbia’s interior, the provincial government is still failing its duty to regulate the safety of hundreds of potentially dangerous dams, a new Auditor-General’s investigation has found.

The report, released Tuesday, also follows a fatal operational error in 2020 at the Cleveland dam in North Vancouver, and B.C. Auditor-General Michael Pickup said there are hundreds of high-risk structures around the province that are not properly regulated, posing a threat to people, property and the environment.

“The ministry is not effectively overseeing the safety of dams,” Mr. Pickup said in an interview. “It’s concerning. That increases the risks that dam owners might not meet the requirements for safety, and it increases the risk that their dams could threaten public safety.”

Story continues below advertisement

B.C. has 1,000 regulated dams, built for electricity, irrigation and flood control, that are rated “high-consequence” – meaning that a failure could kill people, or damage the environment and property.

While owners are responsible for the safety of their dams, the Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development is supposed to ensure compliance with safety regulations.

In his report, the Auditor-General found a series of gaps in oversight, including that nearly 200 dams that should have been regulated were not.

While the provincial government accepts all nine of his recommendations for change, Mr. Pickup said he was troubled by the province’s vague commitments to fix the problems he identified.

“There’s an agreement that ‘we will do something,’ but it’s short on detail as to what’s going to be done, and when it is going to be done,” he said.

The review identified 87 high-risk dams around the province with significant deficiencies that had not addressed their safety problems for more than seven years, on average.

“The ministry did not promptly and effectively follow up with dam owners to enforce compliance with key regulatory requirements or to correct physical deficiencies,” the report found.

Story continues below advertisement

The review also points to reliance on overworked staff and a clunky database that was riddled with errors.

In a sample of dams listed in the government’s database, more than half were missing key information. And almost half of dam safety officers had a backlog of reports to review on whether high-consequence dams are safe. Some dams that require audits have not been audited. The ministry also has no process to track down unregulated dams, and the average time to approve safety reports is 20 months – but some took as long as eight years to process.

“The ministry can’t properly oversee dam owner compliance with the regulations without reliable information, nor can it adequately monitor dam safety or prioritize program resources,” the report noted.

The B.C. government committed to improve dam safety after a massive tailings pond collapsed at Mount Polley in 2014, spilling 25 million cubic metres of pollutants into Quesnel Lake in B.C.’s Interior. The incident was blamed on a design flaw that was compounded when the dam was repeatedly raised.

Ugo Lapointe, Canada program co-ordinator with watchdog group MiningWatch Canada, said the report confirms that the province has relied too much on self-regulation by industry.

“Miniscule sanctions, pitiful fines and lack of timely legal prosecution all lead to a laissez-faire attitude and do not act as a real deterrent for dam owners,” he said. “If dam owners don’t fear the consequences of messing up and not complying with the law, why would they go all the way to do the right thing?”

Story continues below advertisement

The province has recorded an average of three structural dam failures each year over the past five years. In 2010, the Testalinden Dam failed, destroying or damaging five homes and blocking Highway 97 with debris.

Dam safety questions were raised again last year after an uncontrolled release of water through the spillway of the Cleveland dam swept away several people who were fishing downstream in the Capilano River canyon. Two people died, and human error was blamed for the incident.

In its response to the report, the ministry conceded that changes were needed, and promised to review its dam safety measures to strengthen accountability mechanisms. In a statement, the ministry said it will hire five additional dam safety staff in response to the Auditor-General’s recommendations.

We have a weekly Western Canada newsletter written by our B.C. and Alberta bureau chiefs, providing a comprehensive package of the news you need to know about the region and its place in the issues facing Canada. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies