Skip to main content

Earlier this year, British Columbia’s NDP government made a little-noticed change to the Workers Compensation Act that expanded mental-health services for first responders.

In particular, these workers no longer need to point to a specific incident to submit a claim for a mental-health condition related to their work.

“What’s changed is you no longer have to say ‘it was this call on this day that caused this issue,’ ” said Tom Stamatakis, head of the B.C. Police Association. “You still require a diagnosis, but if there is a diagnosis that you’re suffering from a mental-health issue, the presumption is that it’s related to your work, and that’s what enables the quick access to treatment.”

Story continues below advertisement

The shift in how first responders are assessed is one of several changes the labour-friendly New Democrats have made, or planned to make, to the laws that govern workers in the province − part of what observers say is an inevitable pendulum swing that comes with an NDP government.

Those include changes already in place or in progress, such as increases to the minimum wage and requirements to hire unionized workers on government infrastructure projects, as well as plans to track temporary foreign workers and review the province’s labour code.

“Generally [the relationship between the NDP and unions] has been friendly, but I emphasize ‘generally’ it has been friendly because it has not always been [that way],” said Rod Mickleburgh, author of a new book on B.C.’s labour history and a former Globe and Mail reporter.

The NDP received $5-million in donations from unions in 2017 out of a total of $14.2-million. The party also had more than a dozen Steelworkers employees working on its election campaign last year, including the NDP’s campaign deputy director.

The NDP came into office a year ago with support from the BC Greens, replacing the centre-right BC Liberals who had governed the province for 16 years. After long periods of “free-enterprise” government unsympathetic to unions, the NDP always faces a particular challenge, Mr. Mickleburgh said.

“Often the NDP has to manage the pent-up expectations of unions who have really had a tough time with those previous governments and want to restore it all in one, fell swoop …," he said in an interview. “No government can do that.”

When Premier John Horgan appointed his cabinet, he set out a to-do list for his labour minister, Harry Bains

Story continues below advertisement

B.C. Labour Minister Harry Bains. (File Photo).

CHAD HIPOLITO/THE CANADIAN PRESS

The list included a push toward increasing the minimum wage − $11.35 an hour when the NDP was sworn in – to more than $15 by 2021; creating a registry of temporary foreign workers to help track unfair treatment of such workers; developing options to increase compliance with employment laws and standards; and reviewing the Labour Code to ensure workplaces “support a growing, sustainable economy with fair laws for workers and businesses.”

During the election campaign last year, Mr. Horgan also said he wanted to remove rules that force employees who want to unionize to vote by secret ballot, instead switching to a system in which unions are certified if a majority of members sign union cards.

In the year since, the minimum wage has been increased to $12.65 an hour as of this past June – the first of four hikes that will take it to $15.20 by 2021.

Last month, the government announced a plan to use community benefits agreements on major infrastructure projects that would, among other requirements, ensure workers belong to specific unions.

And reviews and consultations are under way focusing on the Employment Standards Act, the B.C. Labour Relations Code and WorkSafeBC – the workers’ compensation organization.

Jim Gilley, a sprinkler fitter for the past 33 years, has happily been a member of the Christian Labour Association of Canada union. He said he has no interest in shifting that affiliation to get infrastructure work under a community benefits agreement.

Story continues below advertisement

The 56-year-old Port Moody resident says he likes the co-operative approach of his union so would sit out work with another union as required by the benefit agreements policy.

“I don’t think I’d be losing out on anything. There’s a ton of work going on,” he said. “I wouldn’t be sitting at home if I didn’t get infrastructure work.”

Mr. Bains, the labour minister, talks of having four years to enact his program, a deadline set by Mr. Horgan who expresses confidence about the government surviving that long with support from the BC Greens.

He said he expects a report on the labour code this month, with changes, as required, next year. Asked about action on the secret ballot − which the Greens oppose − Mr. Bains referred to awaiting the outcome of the labour-code review before any policy change. He expects soon to disclose a legislative direction for temporary foreign workers. There also may be legislative changes to WorkSafe BC, he said.

“You don’t want to rush through. These are very, very complex issues, and there are strongly held beliefs from both sides. The art of creating a balance is where we will be judged.”

Green Party Leader Andrew Weaver is skeptical about some aspects of the labour agenda, and particularly critical of the community benefits agreement for requiring union membership. He calls the requirement “completely regressive.” He has also vowed to oppose any attempt to change union voting rules. However, he does not expect the Greens would defeat the government over its labour policies.

John Martin, labour critic for the Liberals, says there’s nothing surprising about an NDP approach to labour issues that is more receptive to unions.

“We have to accept the reality there’s a new government, and they have a mandate, and they certainly have been upfront about their priorities, and those priorities are to reward those public-sector and private-sector unions that have been very supportive of them over the years,” Mr. Martin said in an interview.

Aaron Ekman, secretary of the BC Federation of Labour, said his organization feels more consulted by an NDP government than with the Liberals, under which he said they had access to the labour minister, but only a half hour annually with former premier Christy Clark.

“We do feel more consulted, but I would not say we’re consulted more than any other group, and certainly not consulted more than the so-called business community or the employer community."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.