Skip to main content

Thereisa and Chris Reid pose for a photo with their children Sydney, left to right, Danica and Aiden in this undated handout photo.

Sarah Sovereign/The Canadian Press

Parents keeping their children home from schools that offer limited or no remote learning options are concerned that spots in specialty programs could be lost unless the British Columbia government takes action.

Students will be back at school Thursday, but some will not return because of their own or a family member’s health or general fears about contracting COVID-19.

Theresia Reid said her daughter Sydney was excited to start her first year at a new arts and technology program at a middle school in Chilliwack but needs to stay home to protect her father.

Story continues below advertisement

Chris Reid is in remission from testicular cancer that spread to his kidneys and lungs. So Sydney, entering Grade 7, and her high school siblings can’t go to class.

“My kids didn’t go back to school in June, they stayed home and we were led to expect that that’s how it would be in September, with a hybrid model,” Ms. Reid said about a mix of in-class and online learning, which is being offered at some schools in B.C.

“I think there should have been, from the beginning, more online options. And not the fear of losing places.”

Ms. Reid said that before a temporary five-week remote learning option was offered, parents were told they could enroll their children in home schooling or distributed learning, which involves online instruction with students being connected to a teacher in a district, not their school.

“They are overwhelmed with inquiries. No one’s contacted me back after my inquiry,” she said, adding Sydney would have lost her spot in the arts and technology program if she’d been registered in either program.

The principal at Sydney’s school told Ms. Reid late last week that the temporary option could be extended, but the family is still awaiting details on what that could mean, she said.

Ms. Reid’s older children, Danica in Grade 11 and Aiden in Grade 9, are autistic and their school is also offering a similar temporary online option.

Story continues below advertisement

Her husband may be forced to move to Kamloops to live with his parents if their children have to return to class, Ms. Reid said.

The province left parents scrambling to deal with principals over the summer instead of taking families’ needs into consideration and allowing their children to continue remote learning that was already in place at the end of the last school year, she said.

A one-size-fits-all approach of in-class learning promoted by the Education Ministry is unworkable, she said.

“It just feels like all the eggs were put in one basket. And there need to be multiple baskets. I feel really badly for the principals. They’re the ones making all these phone calls to the parents, and their hands are tied.”

Education Minister Rob Fleming said districts are making efforts to meet families’ needs based on their responses to a survey.

“As long as I’m seeing districts, and this is what I am seeing, being compassionate and supportive and trying to keep kids and their families connected to schools that’s what we expect,” Mr. Fleming said late last week.

Story continues below advertisement

Amy Cochand said her daughters in Grades 6 and 10 are registered in French immersion at schools with only in-class instruction.

“Right now, our options are basically distributed learning or home schooling and losing their French immersion spots,” Ms. Cochand said from Golden.

“French immersion’s a big deal,” she said, adding her older daughter started the program in kindergarten.

“Ten years of schooling in French and to lose it now would be ridiculous.”

Ms. Cochand said her family has worked hard to keep their contacts to a small number of people, but having their kids in larger groups at school poses too much of a health risk as COVID-19 cases rise in B.C.

Learning groups or cohorts at elementary and middle schools are capped at 60 people while high schools can include up to 120 students based on guidance from the Provincial Health Officer.

Story continues below advertisement

The principal at her younger daughter’s school has said distributed learning is the only option for students who will not be in school full time, Ms. Cochand said.

“But she can’t be in French immersion if she does that, so she would lose her spot.”

B.C. Teachers Federation president Teri Mooring said parents who have the skills to advocate for their children were left to phone principals, and superintendents in some cases, to make “special deals for themselves.”

“The province completely abdicated its responsibility when it just sort of let school districts decide what they were going to do,” Ms. Mooring said, adding that created inequities in the public school system.

“What we are advocating for is that the space be protected and a teacher teaches those children that are learning remotely. That allows that child to remain connected to their school.”

Ms. Mooring said that would require the province to hire more teachers.

Story continues below advertisement

“We learned in the spring that teachers teaching in class and teaching remotely does not work. It adds to their workload to a degree that is not okay.”

Globe health columnist André Picard and senior editor Nicole MacIntyre discuss the many issues surrounding sending kids back to school. André says moving forward isn't about there being no COVID-19 cases, but limiting their number and severity through distancing, smaller classes, masks and good hygiene. The Globe and Mail
Coronavirus information
Coronavirus information
The Zero Canada Project provides resources to help you manage your health, your finances and your family life as Canada reopens.
Visit the hub

This content appears as provided to The Globe by the originating wire service. It has not been edited by Globe staff.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies