Skip to main content
//empty //empty

B.C. landlords should continue to have the right to raise rents as much as they want when a tenant leaves a unit, according to recommendations issued Wednesday by the province’s rental-housing task force.

But the task force also recommended that unnecessary renovictions – the practice of pushing out tenants to do largely cosmetic renovations that allow landlords to then charge higher rents – should be stopped.

Those two major conclusions have pleased developer and landlord organizations – who had warned against imposing onerous new rental rules – but dismayed poverty advocates at a time when there is turmoil in many British Columbia communities over the rising cost of housing.

Story continues below advertisement

“It shows [the task force] caved to the landlords and developers,” said Vancouver Councillor Jean Swanson, a longtime advocate for tenants who has been pushing for years to see limits placed on rent increases. “It’s going to continue the profit motive for renovictions.”

But Jon Stovell, a major developer who is chair of the region’s 750-member Urban Development Institute (UDI), said the recommendations are a welcome relief after months of concern the task force would propose to limit rent increases even more than they already are.

“It’s fantastic news. I think you’ll see an immediate return to optimism,” said Mr. Stovell, whose company is planning at least one major rental building on Broadway. “I think [the task force] has heard the message and heard from the big pension funds that they won’t invest in rental … if they make things too tough.”

He said landlords would have stopped investing in their buildings if they were prohibited from raising rents closer to market levels when tenants turned over in a unit. As well, he said, the proposal to “stop renovictions” is a practical one, since it only prohibits landlords from evicting tenants in order to perform cosmetic improvements on rental units.

The task-force report said that landlords still will likely need to empty out buildings “for the rare instance of serious, major and long-term renovations, such as seismic upgrades.”

A statement from the UDI said it was disappointing that the task force didn’t say anything about how to encourage the construction of more rental supply.

The province’s main non-profit housing association also said that the task-force recommendations showed a good balance.

Story continues below advertisement

“They had a tough job because it’s a crisis here with the rapid escalation of rents,” said B.C. Non-Profit Housing Association CEO Jill Atkey. “It protects tenants without stifling the needed supply.”

The association’s members had been somewhat concerned about limiting rent increases when a tenant moved out, since many non-profit operators need to adjust the mix of subsidized and non-subsidized rents in their buildings to keep up with operating costs.

Under current law, a landlord can only increase rent by a percentage set by the province as long as the same tenant is in the apartment. But if the tenant moves out, the landlord can raise the rent by whatever amount the market might bear.

Because of the tight rental market in the Vancouver region, that led to a proliferation of renovictions, as some landlords looked for ways to get rid of long-term tenants whose rents were below market because of the way rental increases had been limited over the years.

The task force has recommended that, in order to protect renters more in cases of apartment-building demolitions, the province should work with local governments to develop tenant compensation and relocation guidelines. As well, there should be a clear timeline for a tenant’s decision on a right of refusal to come back to a new or renovated unit on the same site.

The task force did introduce a major surprise change earlier this year when it reduced the amount landlords could raise rents for 2019. Until last fall, government policy was that rents could be increased by the rate of inflation plus 2 per cent. Housing Minister Selina Robinson announced in September, though, that any increases would be limited to inflation only, a move that had apartment builders saying it would kill construction in that sector.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies