Skip to main content
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

British Columbia’s New Democratic Party government has spent the past 15 months fighting a group of workers who want the right to organize into a collective bargaining unit.

The case before the Labour Relations Board (LRB) involves 34 public-school principals and vice-principals in the Kootenays, who applied for union certification in March, 2020.

That the province’s labour-friendly government would oppose them is ironic. That the government would argue that unionization would make this group of workers less loyal to their employer is rich. But with the long, stormy history of labour strife in B.C.’s schools, it is at least understandable that the province fears having one more union to deal with in the education sector.

Story continues below advertisement

A decision from the LRB is anticipated soon. If the Southeast Kootenay Principals’ and Vice-Principals’ Association wins, it will overturn a 34-year-old law that denies B.C.’s school administrators the right to join a union.

B.C.’s teachers were given the right to full collective bargaining in 1987, but at that time, principals and vice-principals were excluded as managers.

Since that time, the BC Teachers’ Federation has battled with governments of every political stripe, rarely settling a contract without labour disruptions. Throughout every strike, it is the school administrators – principals and vice-principals – who have been left to cross the picket lines and keep the schools open.

But labour law has evolved, starting with the 2007 Supreme Court of Canada ruling that access to collective bargaining is a Charter-protected activity.

The BC Principals’ & Vice-Principals’ Association (BCPVPA), with 2,600 members, didn’t jump at the court ruling as an opportunity to organize. But over the years, working conditions for their members across the province’s 60 school districts became wildly inconsistent. Even within school districts, individual contracts varied, and could be stripped at will by the trustees.

“They are in a master-servant relationship, where you get what is given to you,” John Rogers, counsel for the association, said in an interview.

Mr. Rogers made his name in B.C. labour law as counsel for the BC Teachers’ Federation, securing a landmark ruling on negotiating class size and composition against the B.C. government in the Supreme Court of Canada in 2016. In 2017, the BCPVPA quietly approached him for an opinion on whether it could unionize.

Story continues below advertisement

He believes it can, arguing that B.C. is violating a fundamental Charter right – the freedom of association – by denying his clients the right to unionize. Still, the association didn’t pursue it. What it wants is the ability to collectively bargain working conditions for its members, with a dispute-resolution mechanism instead of the right to strike.

“Our members across the province do not have a desire to unionize,” said Kevin Reimer, president of the BCPVPA. “We don’t want that much power, so don’t put us in the position where we have to ask for it. We don’t want the nuclear codes, let’s find something that works for everyone.”

The B.C. Public Sector Employers’ Association rebuffed the appeal to work out a mechanism for collective bargaining. It maintains that principals and vice-principals are managers and therefore have no rights to do so.

In School District 5 – the southwest Kootenays – conditions got to the point where the local chapter decided it had nothing to lose. Compensation was arbitrary, and many teachers earn more than vice-principals. It took the only route left, which was to apply to the LRB for certification as a union.

Keith Evans, counsel for the Attorney-General, held the pen for the school district in the LRB hearings. In his March 29, 2020, filing, Mr. Evans made “loyalty” a reason to deny certification. Having a separate bargaining unit for administrators, who in turn have to manage employees in another union, would create a potential conflict of interest, he wrote: Their loyalties would be divided.

Stephanie Higginson, president of the BC School Trustees Association, which represents the employer in B.C. public schools, said the case now before the LRB might have provincewide implications, because it would allow other chapters to seek certification without the long battle waged in School District 5. Whether others would follow, however, is not yet clear.

Story continues below advertisement

What is evident, however, is that trustees would do well to keep their principals and vice-principals happy. “I would hope in districts, they are treating their principals and vice-principals as the incredibly valuable school leaders they are – the hours they work are insane,” she said. “There is an encouragement to be good employers.”

Oddly, the Ministry of Education is not doing much to resolve this brewing conflict. Since the BCPVPA supported the certification application by its one chapter, Mr. Reimer’s twice-monthly discussions with the deputy minister stopped. “I have not spoken to the deputy minister in 15 months,” he said.

We have a weekly Western Canada newsletter written by our B.C. and Alberta bureau chiefs, providing a comprehensive package of the news you need to know about the region and its place in the issues facing Canada. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies