Skip to main content

A tax intended to curb B.C. real estate speculation and push homeowners to rent out their empty properties has so far generated $115-million, with foreign owners and satellite families accounting for two-thirds of such taxpayers, according to the province.

That figure includes $58-million from the 2018 calendar year and $57-million from the first quarter of 2019, when the rate for owners living outside of Canada and those who pay little to no income tax in British Columbia quadrupled to 2 per cent, according to data released by the B.C. government on Thursday.

Finance Minister Carole James said the first-year declarations show that the tax is working as the government had intended.

Story continues below advertisement

“It is in fact targeting speculators, people living outside of B.C.,” she said, adding that 99.8 per cent of British Columbians are exempt from paying the tax.

“It is also helping to encourage homes to be used to house people – not to be used for speculation, not to be used to create challenges in our communities."

As of Sept. 3, 11,783 homeowners in B.C. are paying the tax, according to the government. This includes 4,621 foreign owners, 3,060 satellite families, 1,519 Canadians living outside of B.C., 2,362 B.C. residents and 221 others, such as properties held through corporations and trusts.

An estimated 17,000 people still have not completed their declarations.

The government says that the tax is contributing to the “ongoing moderation” in B.C.’s housing market, including a 5.6-per-cent decline in home-sale prices based on the first three months of 2019, although there is no data to definitively link the two.

Ms. James said the tax is only a piece of the government’s 30-point housing plan aimed at improving affordability and creating more rental homes.

“One measure is not going to fix the crisis that was left us, but a combination of measures … is having an impact,” she said.

Story continues below advertisement

Thomas Davidoff, an associate professor at the University of B.C.’s Sauder School of Business, said the net effect on revenue is unclear, but that the tax does appear to have raised revenue and likely led some homeowners to sell or rent out their properties.

“I think it’s reasonable to conclude that it has had the effects that were desired,” he said.

The government estimates that the tax will generate $185-million in each of the 2019-20 and 2020-21 years; Mr. Davidoff said it can be expected that that figure will decrease over time.

“You have to think the behavioural response will take some time to adapt,” he said. “The only counter to that is that they might get better with enforcement, especially with satellite families.”

Some municipalities have criticized the tax, saying it has created uncertainty and hindered new construction. Homeowners have also expressed frustration with having to apply for exemptions every year.

“We have locally elected mayors telling John Horgan that the speculation tax is not working in their communities and that it is reducing the construction of new and affordable homes for families,” B.C. Liberal finance co-critic Shirley Bond said in a statement.

Story continues below advertisement

Ms. James, who on Thursday met with mayors of municipalities where the tax applies, said she will be collecting feedback and any changes that may be needed will be looked at in the fall.

The update in B.C. came on the same day that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau pledged to implement a federal levy of 1 per cent to curb foreign speculation.

“One of the knock-on effects of the B.C. initiative is that that has pushed capital to other parts of the country where there isn’t that modest speculation tax,” he told reporters in Victoria. “That is why we feel it is important to create a national measure right across the country based on B.C.’s success with it to ensure that foreign speculation doesn’t make housing less affordable for Canadians who, as we know, are looking for places to live.”

With a report from Michelle Zilio in Victoria

We have a weekly Western Canada newsletter written by our B.C. and Alberta bureau chiefs, providing a comprehensive package of the news you need to know about the region and its place in the issues facing Canada. Sign up today.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter