Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Cancel Anytime
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Canada’s most-awarded
newsroom for a reason
Stay informed for a
lot less, cancel anytime
“Exemplary reporting on
COVID-19” – Herman L
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Walkable neighbourhoods with lush tree canopies such as in downtown Vancouver promote healthier lifestyles than marginalized neighbourhoods on city fringes.

Darryl Dyck for The Globe and Mail

Vancouver feels like a lushly green city to its residents in comparison with many older cities elsewhere.

But a new, first-ever study has found only about third of the land in Metro Vancouver’s urban areas has tree cover and that amount is projected to decline by another 4 per cent – 3,000 hectares – in the next 20 years, if development continues as is.

And Metro Vancouver planners are recommending that cities aggressively look for ways to plant trees in order to make up for the losses as the region continues to gain new residents and they are packed in ever more tightly, because trees – the bigger, the better – help cool streets, mitigate stormwater floods and act as carbon-storage units.

Story continues below advertisement

“It’s not inevitable that density means no trees,” said Josephine Clark, an environmental planner with the region who oversaw the study, which was presented to Metro Vancouver’s planning committee. “There are ways of doing it where we don’t have to lose them.”

In fact, the study showed that most of the tree loss in the past 50 years has been in relatively low-density sites – single-family house lots – as builders increasingly opted for bigger houses, garages, driveways and patios.

According to the study, single-family developments used to result in about 36 per cent tree canopy in the 1970s. By 2000, the rate was down to 18 per cent.

That “indicates that fewer, or smaller, trees are being retained or planted during construction of low-density housing over time,” the study noted.

In contrast, low-rise apartment buildings and taller condo towers, at least those built until very recently, were often constructed on large lots where builders put in lawns and several trees around them, making them greener than some single-family areas.

That is likely changing, said Ms. Clark, as apartment buildings are more and more taking up the whole lot.

Some cities have already done their own studies measuring tree canopy in recent years and found some startling results.

Story continues below advertisement

Surrey’s tree cover in the area (defined as being inside what Metro calls its “urban containment boundary,” which excludes protected agricultural land and defined greenbelts) fell from about 34 per cent in 2000 to 28 per cent by 2013.

The City of Vancouver went from around 20 per cent in 1995 to 18 per cent in a 2013 study, although Ms. Clark’s report pegged the cover at around 23 per cent, putting Vancouver in the mid-range compared with a low of 11 per cent in Richmond and a high of 64 per cent for West Vancouver.

New Westminster, Richmond and White Rock have also measured their tree cover and seen declines.

Some of them, especially Vancouver, New Westminster and White Rock, have adopted energetic new efforts to ensure that trees aren’t lost or that they are replaced if they are taken down because they’re diseased or in the way of new development.

Surrey, where Councillor Steven Pettigrew routinely expresses dismay about the number of trees coming down in the dozens of developments the city approves every year, has a policy that it is trying to maintain tree cover at 30 per cent, with a requirement that there be one-to-one replacement for each black cottonwood or red alder taken down on private property.

And Nadia Chan, the manager for trees and landscapes in Surrey, said the city is undergoing a review of its tree-protection bylaw.

Story continues below advertisement

Many residents, responding to a Globe request on Twitter for stories, replied with tales of lengthy negotiations with their city officials over attempts to take down a single tree.

Sherida Charles, a New Westminster resident with a 38-metre poplar on her property that is three-metres in diameter, said she tried to get city permission to take it down because she and her husband are worried about it falling in a windstorm.

But she was told by city officials that it was very unlikely she would ever get a permit, so she’s resigned for now – and sees the benefit.

“I love trees and that tree is like a high-rise building for animals, squirrels, birds.”

Ms. Clark said the public needs to get more information about how valuable trees are, especially larger ones.

“We need people to value them and the bigger, the better. Big, mature trees are the powerhouses.”

Story continues below advertisement

We have a weekly Western Canada newsletter written by our B.C. and Alberta bureau chiefs, providing a comprehensive package of the news you need to know about the region and its place in the issues facing Canada. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies