Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Suspended sergeant-at-arms Gary Lenz speaks to reporters at his home in North Saanich, B.C., on May 16, 2019.

CHAD HIPOLITO/The Canadian Press

B.C.’s former sergeant-at-arms, who was tied to a spending scandal involving the clerk of the B.C. Legislature, will not face any charges after two special prosecutors were unable to find evidence to substantiate them.

The British Columbia Prosecution Service says the two special prosecutors, high-profile lawyers David Butcher and Brock Martland, concluded the charge assessment standard was not met to justify charging Gary Lenz.

Mr. Lenz, along with the former clerk of the legislature, Craig James, was publicly escorted out of the legislature by police in November, 2018. The then-speaker of the legislature, Darryl Plecas, later produced an explosive report outlining allegations of misspending at the legislative assembly.

Story continues below advertisement

Former B.C. sergeant-at-arms lied about spending scandal, independent report finds

Suspended Sergeant-at-Arms Gary Lenz retires after B.C. Legislature scandal

Mr. James, who had worked at the legislature for decades, was charged. In a court appearance last month, Mr. James pleaded not guilty to five charges, including breach of trust and fraud, while the judge tossed out one of the accusations against him.

Mr. Lenz has denied any wrongdoing. He issued a statement Tuesday saying he was pleased with the special prosecutors’ decision. He thanked the police, prosecutors, and friends and family who stood by him.

“I have always maintained my innocence, and now it is clear for everyone to see,” the statement said. “I look forward to putting this ordeal behind me and enjoying my retirement with my loved ones.”

After the report by Mr. Plecas was released, Beverley McLachlin, former chief justice of the Supreme Court of Canada, was appointed to look into the allegations against Mr. Lenz and Mr. James.

In her subsequent 2019 report, she said Mr. James improperly claimed benefits and used legislature property for personal reasons, but that Mr. Lenz did not engage in misconduct. The report also noted there was a lack of clarity in authority over expenses and administrative matters at the legislature.

Mr. Lenz retired from his job in 2019, saying that although he had carried out his duties with the “utmost integrity,” he had concluded “that the damage that has been done to my reputation will never be fully repaired, and that if I continued as sergeant-at-arms, I would be doing a disservice to my office.”

A week after his retirement, an independent review under the B.C. Police Act, conducted by former Vancouver Police Department investigator Doug LePard, concluded that Mr. Lenz repeatedly did not tell the truth when questioned about some of the spending-scandal allegations.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Plecas maintained that Mr. Lenz “told him on numerous occasions that Mr. James had committed a theft of a large amount of Legislative Assembly liquor in April, 2013,” Mr. LePard wrote, and that he wanted to use that information to compel Mr. James to resign. But when Ms. McLachlin interviewed Mr. Lenz, the sergeant-at-arms denied that he had accused his colleague of theft.

Mr. Lenz told Mr. LePard he was aware of the liquor loaded into Mr. James’ truck, but “said that he assumed he was taking it to the [liquor distribution branch] for a refund.”

Mr. Lenz strongly disputed Mr. LePard’s conclusions.

Mr. James will face trial by judge alone when he returns to court, with proceedings expected to begin in January.

B.C.’s former auditor-general also released a report into the spending allegations last year, finding “a number of weaknesses and gaps” in financial oversight for top officers at the legislature that allowed for hundreds of thousands of dollars in questionable expenses to go unchecked.

Carol Bellringer emphasized that her review was not a financial audit, but an effort to inform the legislative assembly on its financial processes and practices. She stopped short of ruling on any instance of fraud.

Story continues below advertisement

The Canadian Press with a report from Globe staff

We have a weekly Western Canada newsletter written by our B.C. and Alberta bureau chiefs, providing a comprehensive package of the news you need to know about the region and its place in the issues facing Canada. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies