Skip to main content

A major Vancouver housing co-op is facing a half-million-dollar debt that is forcing it to significantly raise rents and offer fewer subsidized units to low-income people.

And the board that manages the 200-unit Lore Krill Co-op, which includes two buildings in the city’s Gastown and Chinatown neighbourhoods, is blaming a mix of inadequate funding and flawed agreements with the provincial government that set out how rents are calculated.

“The last thing we need is for people who need housing to be forced to move out because they can’t afford the rent,” said Coco Culbertson, the treasurer of Lore Krill’s board.

Story continues below advertisement

The Krill has seen high maintenance costs, and the board argues the province’s housing agency, BC Housing, does not provide fair compensation.

“We have two huge co-ops in the middle of the Downtown Eastside. Our mailbox is broken into every week. It just costs us more to run this,” Ms. Culbertson said.

The co-op has been forced not only to raise the rents, but it is also slowly reducing the number of subsidized apartments in the building from 80 per cent to 60 per cent.

For one resident, Kelly Moorhead, a former legal secretary now living on disability because of her multiple sclerosis, that situation means the rent on the prized one-bedroom she just moved into after waiting for four years might jump from $975 to $1,350 a month.

Kelly Moorhead on the patio at the Lore Krill Co-op in Vancouver.

BEN NELMS/The Globe and Mail

“I’m just getting settled in and that’s a big hike,” Ms. Moorhead said.

The Krill’s increased maintenance costs are compounded by how rental rates in the building are calculated.

The Krill is one of a small number of co-ops in the province whose agreement under the Homes BC program, created in the late 1990s by the NDP government, requires the co-op to ensure that the rents charged for its unsubsidized apartments correspond to rental rates among private developments in the area.

Story continues below advertisement

Almost all social housing built since the 1970s operates on a model of mixed subsidies and incomes. The poorest residents pay welfare-level rates for their apartments. Low-income but somewhat better-off residents get a subsidy that ensures they spend no more than 30 per cent of their income on rent. And some people pay rates that are labelled “low end of market” – no subsidy, but with rents geared to reflect the cheaper apartments in their neighbourhood.

In Vancouver’s Chinatown, Gastown and Downtown Eastside, those market rates have soared recently, creating a situation where Krill residents in the non-subsidized apartments were asked to pay a big increase four years ago and are facing another one now.

“This was a program designed in the late nineties, but it doesn’t work now,” said Thom Armstrong, executive director of the Co-operative Housing Federation of B.C. “Thirty years ago, the market rate was a great measure. Now, everyone agrees that the market has spiralled out of control. So ‘market rate’ is just not a reliable measure any more.”

Mr. Armstrong, whose organization is part of a consortium now building hundreds of units of housing through a community land-trust model in Vancouver, said he has learned not to accept that kind of provision in any new buildings.


BC Housing’s vice-president of operations, Craig Crawford, said the Krill’s operation costs exceed that of any other co-op, something that he and co-op management are going to discuss in coming meetings.

Story continues below advertisement

As for changes to the rental agreement, Mr. Crawford said it’s something that’s been brought up from time to time but BC Housing doesn’t have any immediate plans to change it.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies