Skip to main content

Detached homes are pictured in Vancouver, B.C., on March 4, 2019. For detached houses in Vancouver, the value of the median assessment of a single-detached house was $236,000 more – 36.7 per cent higher – than the median-valued resident-owned property.

BEN NELMS/The Globe and Mail

A new housing report shows the rate of non-residents owning property is higher in British Columbia than in Ontario and the assessed value of those properties is worth more than those owned by residents. The figures, one industry watcher says, show B.C.’s foreign-buyers tax hasn’t entirely dampened international interest in the B.C. housing market.

The Statistics Canada report examines non-resident ownership based on whether the single owner or one of the owners of the property does not live in Canada. Newly-constructed condos in Vancouver especially attracted the foreign market: 19 per cent of condos built between 2016 and 2017 were owned or partially owned by non-residents. In Toronto, Canada’s other hot housing market, that number was 7.6 per cent.

In Vancouver, the median assessment value of a non-resident-owned condo was worth $96,000 more than those owned by residents. In Toronto, the gap was $37,000.

Story continues below advertisement

For detached houses in Vancouver, the value of the median assessment of a single-detached house was $236,000 more – 36.7 per cent higher – than the median-valued resident-owned property.

Real estate economist Tom Davidoff, of the University of British Columbia’s Sauder School of Business, said the numbers show that Vancouver remains popular for residents even after the foreign-buyers tax was implemented in 2016.

“Vancouver was a very attractive place for people who don’t necessarily make their living in Vancouver to buy real estate, and what that says to me is the empty homes tax and speculation tax are, in that way, a quite helpful policy,” he said in an interview.

The data doesn’t show the same kind of value gap between non-resident owned single-detached homes in Ontario and those owned by residents, but the gap widens when it comes to newer units, especially condominiums.

Analysis: Government interventions in real estate are cooling the market - how much success is enough?

First-of-its-kind registry in B.C. aims to crack down on under-the-radar condo flippers

‘A reality check’: Housing prices continue to drop in Vancouver

Mr. Davidoff said the data indicate non-resident buyers are concentrated at the top of the market.

However, he predicted the luxury home market has already been affected by all those taxes, including the foreign-buyers tax, empty homes tax and the speculation tax, and the impact will continue among out-of-town buyers.

Among all property types in both B.C. and Ontario, condominiums are the most popular for ownership among non-resident owners.

Story continues below advertisement

The report says properties that have at least one non-resident owner amount to 6.2 per cent in B.C., with 3.7 per cent owned by non-residents only. While in Ontario, 3.3 per cent of the properties are partially owned by non-resident and 2.1 per cent belong to non-resident only.

Both rates are higher in the Vancouver and Toronto areas. In the Vancouver area, nearly 5 per cent of the properties are solely possessed by non-residents, compared to 2.5 per cent in the Toronto area.

Josh Gordon, assistant professor at the Simon Fraser University School of Public Policy, said it’s good that this data is finally being gathered and released, but he said questions remain unanswered.

“There is the question of where the money is coming from for purchases or ownership, rather than simply ‘residency.’ Some of those deemed ‘resident’ may nevertheless be using foreign income or wealth, for example,” he said in an e-mail.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies