Skip to main content

B.C. government efforts to protect species at risk should be monitored by a special independent scientific body, a team of conservation and biodiversity experts said in a study released Tuesday.

“This is a key idea that I think helps move to action quickly,” said Brian Starzomski, a biodiversity professor at the University of Victoria. He was co-author of the Protecting Biodiversity In British Columbia study.

As the provincial government drafts species-at-risk legislation expected in 2019, Mr. Starzomski’s team says the proposed oversight organization is central to their proposal for saving species at risk – a necessity given what the group describes as a “patchwork” of provincial laws and regulations it says has not prevented species loss and decline.

Story continues below advertisement

The group cites findings by the national Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada that 278 species are at risk of extinction in B.C. – the largest number in any Canadian province or territory – but notes that B.C. has no law to protect such species.

The report comes from the efforts of 18 academics at institutions such as the University of British Columbia, the University of Victoria, Simon Fraser University and the University of Waterloo. They worked in conjunction with the Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative, a non-profit organization that acts to protect habitation in the region spanning the Yellowstone to Yukon region of North America.

The proposed Independent Oversight Committee would, the group suggests, prioritize the assessment of species, list species, help guide recovery efforts and evaluate the effectiveness of actions.

As part of its work, it would establish recovery teams to help particular species in trouble and prioritize recovery actions.

Members would include experts in ecological and conservation sciences, including those with Indigenous knowledge able, the report says, "to participate independently of their affiliations.”

Mr. Starzomski said the committee would focus its expertise. “It’s a way to get together the people who know these species, the threats to them and the best ways to prioritize action to get together to be able to ensure that the entire process happens quickly and effectively.”

He said he is aware of a similar oversight committee in Ontario as well as the federal Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada.

Story continues below advertisement

Over all, the group says it is calling for provincial legislation on the issue that offers a “systematic, planned and evidence-informed approach” that protects and allows for the recovery of species at risk, offers mandatory reporting on actions taken, and legislated timelines for listing, setting priorities and reporting.

It should also include Indigenous peoples as partners in the effort, the authors said.

Because endangered-species legislation may conflict with the sovereign interests of Indigenous peoples, the authors of the study recommend reconciliation as a guiding principle as well as working on a nation-to-nation basis with First Nations.

In a statement responding to the report, the B.C. Environment Ministry said it is familiar with the work of Mr. Starzomski’s group and welcomes their input.

The ministry said it is consulting with Indigenous leaders, local governments, industry groups and non-government associations, among others.

“Developing legislation of this magnitude and scope takes a great deal of consultation with stakeholders, Indigenous nations and the public, and we’re taking the time we need to get it right,” the statement said.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter