Skip to main content

British Columbia Trudeau accepts Indigenous inquiry’s finding of genocide

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Sophie Gregoire Trudeau leave the ceremonies marking the release of the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women report carrying a copy of the report in Gatineau, Que., on Monday June 3, 2019.

Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau acknowledged on Tuesday that Canada’s historical actions resulted in a genocide of Indigenous women and girls, but said Canada must move beyond debates about the term to taking steps to fix the situation.

“We recognized the need for a national public inquiry into missing and murdered Indigenous women and girls and we have commissioners who came back with findings of fact and with calls to action,” he said to media at the Women Deliver conference in Vancouver.

“We thank them for their work, we applaud their work and we accept their findings, including that what happened amounts to genocide. There are many debates ongoing around words and use of words. Our focus as a country, as leaders, as citizens, must be on the steps we take to put an end to this situation.”

Story continues below advertisement

The Prime Minister was then asked if he personally believed the harms done to Canada’s Indigenous people amounted to genocide.

"I have acknowledged that I accept the findings of the report, and the issue that we have is that people are getting wrapped up in debates over a very important and powerful term," he said.

“As I’ve said, we accept the finding that this was genocide. And we will move forward to end this ongoing national tragedy.”

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says he accepts a national inquiry's finding that Canada's treatment of missing and murdered Indigenous women and girls amounts to genocide. But Trudeau says people are wrapped up in the use the powerful term, when the focus should be on how to put an end to the issues raised by the inquiry. The Canadian Press

Mr. Trudeau’s comments come one day after the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls released its 1,200-page report concluding that the Canadian state deliberately and systematically violated racial, gender, human and Indigenous rights, with its actions amounting to genocide.

The Prime Minister did not use the word when discussing the report in Ottawa on Monday despite being called upon to do so. Later that day in Vancouver, he did so, saying the report found that the violence amounts to genocide.

The United Nations defines genocide as acts “committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group” including, for example, killing members of the group, imposing measures intended to prevent births within it, or forcibly transferring its children to another group.

On Tuesday, the secretary-general of the Organization of American States (OAS) wrote to Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland to suggest an international body be created “to clarify the accusations and denunciations of genocide in your country.”

Story continues below advertisement

The inquiry’s final report, and its conclusion that genocide occurred, could have implications for Canada on the global stage, said Sheryl Lightfoot, who holds the Canada Research Chair of Global Indigenous Rights and Politics at the University of British Columbia.

“The reputational issue is clearly at stake – because there is no doubt that Canada stakes its place in the world … as a human-rights steward, a democratic country of the highest quality. And when something like this comes out, it does shock the world,” she added.

In a June 3 letter to Ms. Freeland, OAS Secretary-General Luis Almagro said he “must communicate my deepest consternation regarding the existence of evidence of genocide against Indigenous women and girls in your country.”

Adam Austen, a spokesman for Ms. Freeland’s office, said on Tuesday in an e-mail that the government will respond to the suggestion of an experts’ group.

“Canada is a strong supporter of the rules-based international order and the multilateral institutions that underpin it, very much including the OAS, of which we are proud to be an active member. We have received the letter from Secretary-General Almagro and will provide a response to this request in due course,” he added.

Bruno Gelinas-Faucher, a Canadian lawyer pursuing a PhD in international law at the University of Cambridge who has worked at the International Court of Justice, said the debate over the use of “genocide” in the inquiry’s final report concerns two different issues: whether the facts in Canada meet the definition of genocide and whether Canada as a state is responsible for that genocide under international law.

Story continues below advertisement

The inquiry says the definition is met, and uses the term throughout its report. It also issued a legal opinion backing that conclusion.

But even if the definition is met, there are questions as to whether the state would bear responsibility, Mr. Gelinas-Faucher said, including whether some incidents took place before genocide was legally prohibited.

In Toronto, Assembly of First Nations National Chief Perry Bellegarde welcomed the Prime Minister’s use of the term, but said he hoped the public and governments would focus on corrective action.

“When you look at the definition of genocide in United Nations conventions, there are five elements, and you just have to meet one of them. Even forcibly removing children from homes – that happened. Inflicting pain, forced sterilization – that happened. … I would just encourage all Canadians, and all leaders, yes, to look at the definition of genocide. But again, to focus on the next steps for implementation and a national action strategy,” he said.

With reports from Justin Giovannetti and Laura Stone

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter