Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }

Renters who are displaced by new development should get double the compensation they do now from builders – up to 24 months’ worth of rent for long-term tenants – and more help finding new apartments, especially if they are vulnerable, says a recommendation from Vancouver city staff.

But the report going to council next Tuesday does not go as far as some of Vancouver’s neighbouring suburbs, where new councils have beefed up protective measures recently as they grapple with a housing crisis that has seen hundreds of renters in the region displaced by renovations or new development.

The policy recommended for Vancouver doesn’t require developers to allow previous tenants to move back into new units at their old rents, as Burnaby’s new policy does. And it doesn’t tie improper “renovictions” to possible loss of a business licence, as New Westminster’s does.

Story continues below advertisement

A second Vancouver staff report recommends the city use $5.6-million from its empty-homes-tax revenue to create a “renters centre” that would put under one roof renter-advocacy groups, the province’s residential-tenancy office and city staff as a resource for the half of the city population that rents.

“It’s to show renters that we have their backs,” Mayor Kennedy Stewart said. “I feel this is going to help push developers away from older buildings.”

But council’s strongest renter advocate, COPE’s Jean Swanson, says she’s disappointed the staff recommendations aren’t stronger.

“I wish we could have been bolder like New Westminster and Burnaby,” she said. “There is a lot of stuff in [the reports] that is accepting what the landlords say at face value.”

Ms. Swanson prefers a proposal to work with the province to create a new law stipulating that landlords can’t raise rents dramatically in between tenants.

“It would take the profit motive out of evictions.”

In B.C. currently, landlords are restricted in raising rents to a provincially stipulated cost-of-living percentage as long as the same tenant is in a unit. But the landlord can raise the rent when there is turnover.

Story continues below advertisement

As well, Ms. Swanson would like to see Vancouver adopt what Burnaby now has as policy – any tenant who has to move out of a building being redeveloped has to be offered a unit of the same size at the same old rent in the new building.

Developers and landlords were quick to criticize that Burnaby policy after it was approved last month, saying it would likely lead to less development and fewer new rental units because the costs would be too high to meet all of the city’s requirements.

The Vancouver staff report says planners will monitor Burnaby’s policy ideas and see how they play out in the coming months, but that it seemed too risky to require developers to house former tenants in new units at rents they were paying before.

“This was identified as one of the most significant potential financial challenges to creating new rental housing,” the report said.

Vancouver has seen 589 of its older apartment units demolished in the past 10 years for new developments. Those developments created 1,350 new units, but at rents much higher than the lost units.

The spiralling cost of real estate has meant that many more people arriving in the city are renting, which has put noticeable pressure on the city’s rental stock from the 1960s and 1970s. The report notes that three-quarters of the net new arrivals to Vancouver between 2011 and 2016 became renters, compared with only 41 per cent in the previous five years.

Story continues below advertisement

Since 2007, Vancouver has had controls on demolitions of those older apartment buildings, including a requirement for one-to-one replacement and some compensation money for displaced tenants.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies