Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Support quality journalism
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
The Globe and Mail
Support quality journalism
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Globe and Mail website displayed on various devices
Just$1.99
per week
for the first 24 weeks

var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){console.log("scroll");var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1);

Vancouver police are defending the value of street checks as a pro-active public-safety tool helpful for fighting crime, but say reforms to the way they are done should deal with community concerns about them.

At the monthly police board meeting on Thursday, the department responded, in detail, to criticism of the checks, which have been stopped or effectively ruled out in other Canadian cities.

“It’s like with any contentious issue. You will have people that will come down on the side that you should never do [these] under any circumstances whatsoever. You will have other people who think the police should do these all the time,” Chief Constable Adam Palmer told reporters.

Story continues below advertisement

He said the newly unveiled guidelines find a “sweet spot” that respects civil and human rights, but also still allows the police to prevent crime.

Earlier in the week, the Vancouver police announced they are adopting a new policy in which street checks cannot be used in an arbitrary or random way based on such factors as race or colour.

The new rules, added to the department’s regulations and procedures manual, say police must ensure that interaction with a person is voluntary, by telling them they are not required to provide identifying information or answer questions, and that they can walk away at any time.

Vancouver Mayor Kennedy Stewart, who attended the meeting on Thursday, said the police board is reviewing a report on the subject and will consider additional policy measures.

“It’s something we will continually look at because it is an issue. I do think these provincial guidelines are a very, very good first step,” he said.

However, the B.C. Civil Liberties Association remains concerned.

The association and the Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs have previously raised concerns about the checks. Data released in 2018 by the Vancouver police through a freedom of information request show stops disproportionately involved people who were Indigenous or black.

Story continues below advertisement

Meghan McDermott, the BCCLA’s staff lawyer, acknowledged the police have, at least, adopted policy on the issue, but said that the new policy “misses the mark” because the terminology in the policy is confusing.

She said, in an interview, that there is no evidence that checks have been helpful and that what has been provided is largely anecdotal.

Ms. McDermott also said the BCCLA is concerned about the dispensation of data collected during past police checks that did not conform to the new policy.

“There needs to be a severe restriction on how the police interact with members of the public because the voluntariness of an interaction, we think, is like kind of an oxymoron,” she said.

"What we say [is] that all interactions between the public and police are inherently non-voluntary.”

The monthly police-board meeting saw the release of a report from Drazen Manojlovic, the planning and research director for the force, in which he dubbed the approach a public-safety tool.

Story continues below advertisement

“There are many documented cases where a street check was ultimately the key to solving investigations ranging from property crime to serious violent crimes, including homicides,” he wrote.

And also the report emphasizes the need for police to ensure people are voluntarily co-operating with officers during checks.

“It is acknowledged that a street check can be a stressful event for citizens. Not everyone who is stopped (and not formally detained) by the police will understand that they have the right to proceed on their way without answering questions,” Mr. Manojlovic’s report said.

“If a person reasonably but erroneously believes they have no choice but to co-operate with the police, Canadian law will find a psychological detention has occurred.”

During a presentation to the board, Mr. Manojlovic said officers who are about to do a street check, but conclude the member of the public feels psychologically detained, should end the street check at that moment.

“You need to be able to explain to the individual that, ‘Hey look. This is what I observed and this is why I am talking to you right now.’ Prior to that you need to inform them of, ‘You don’t have to talk to me.' "

Story continues below advertisement

We have a weekly Western Canada newsletter written by our B.C. and Alberta bureau chiefs, providing a comprehensive package of the news you need to know about the region and its place in the issues facing Canada. Sign up today.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies