Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Support quality journalism
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24weeks
The Globe and Mail
Support quality journalism
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Globe and Mail website displayed on various devices
Just$1.99
per week
for the first 24weeks

var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){console.log("scroll");var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1);

Doug Downey is sworn into his new role as Ontario's Attorney-General at Queen's Park in Toronto on June 20, 2019. The independence of the judiciary is one of the underpinnings of democratic government.

Tijana Martin/The Canadian Press

Even from a government more trustworthy than the one led by Doug Ford, an out-of-the-blue proposal to reform how judges are appointed in Ontario would deserve some pretty close scrutiny. If citizens are to have faith in the courts, those on the bench must be regarded as free from all political influence. But when the proposal comes from a member of Mr. Ford’s cabinet, extreme caution is in order.

The idea was floated by Attorney-General Doug Downey. He told a legal conference this month that the appointment process is slow and inefficient. Applicants have to fill out 20-page paper forms, then go through a screening that sometimes takes months. Some have been turned down so many times they have given up. He sees only the top two candidates, forwarded to him for his recommendation to cabinet by an independent committee of lawyers, judges and community members. As a result, he claims, many worthy candidates are excluded.

Wouldn’t it be better, he asked, to give the AG a little more discretion? Shouldn’t he be entrusted with the choosing, rather than leaving it to an obscure committee? Why not at least create a pool of candidates to pick from? “I can tell you, they will be of the highest quality and it will allow us to create further diversity on the bench,” he said.

Story continues below advertisement

Almost as soon as Mr. Downey spoke, red flags shot up around the legal community. One lawyers’ group, the Advocates’ Society, told him in a blunt letter that the changes “threaten to undermine public confidence in the appointment process and have significant implications for public confidence in the quality and independence of Ontario’s judiciary.”

After all, the attorney-general is responsible for the prosecutors who present cases to judges and justices of the peace in provincial courts. Should the person in charge of prosecutions really get more power to choose the judges those prosecutors appear before? The Leafs don’t get to choose the ref, although they might win more games if they did.

Potential changes to the judicial-appointment process will not cause a buzz at any water cooler, but it matters. The independence of the judiciary is one of the underpinnings of democratic government. Judges are often called upon to rein in elected officials when they overstep their authority and trample on individual rights.

That is why it’s so important to have a selection system that keeps politicians at arm’s length.

A renowned attorney-general, Ian Scott, a Liberal, set up Ontario’s widely admired system in 1988. He created an independent advisory committee to help the government choose judges. The NDP government of Bob Rae enshrined it in legislation in the early 1990s. It has been cited by scholars and by other governments as a model.

If it ain’t broke, why fix it? In fact, why let this gang anywhere near it? Above-board appointments are not exactly their strong suit. Mr. Ford’s government was in hot water for months over an attempt to install a friend of the Premier as head of the provincial police. It had to back down from making another appointment when it came to light that a 26-year-old man selected to be Ontario’s envoy to New York played lacrosse with the son of Mr. Ford’s chief of staff.

This Premier seems blind to the need for an independent judiciary. He was scathing about a judge who dared rule against his government when it brought in legislation cutting the size of Toronto City Council in half in the midst of a municipal election campaign. “He’s the judge, I’m the Premier,” he said, threatening to use the notwithstanding clause of the Constitution to override rulings that went against him. He even said – incorrectly – that former premier Dalton McGuinty had appointed the offending judge, implying that the fix was in.

Story continues below advertisement

It would be foolhardy to let a government led by such a man fiddle with the way we select our judges.

Editor’s note: An earlier version of this article incorrectly said a system for appointing Ontario judges was enshrined in legislation under the Conservative government of Mike Harris. In fact, it was under the NDP government of Bob Rae.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Related topics

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies